55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-0456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating a Monotonically-Integrated Large Eddy Simulation Code for Subsonic Jet Acoustics

Abstract: The results of subsonic jet validation cases for the Naval Research Lab's Jet Engine Noise REduction (JENRE) code are reported. Two set points from the Tanna matrix, set point 3 (Ma = 0.5, unheated) and set point 7 (Ma = 0.9, unheated) are attempted on three different meshes. After a brief discussion of the JENRE code and the meshes constructed for this work, the turbulent statistics for the axial velocity are presented and compared to experimental data, with favorable results. Preliminary simulations for set … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we study a spatially developing round jet configuration having different jet-to-ambient temperature ratios corresponding to the experiments by Bridges and Wernet (BW-Exp) [39]. This experimental dataset has been used for the assessment of LES results by many groups [57,58,59,60]. In addition, a similar configuration comprising of a stronger temperature ratio, representative of typical reacting flows (e.g.…”
Section: Unheated and Heated Round Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we study a spatially developing round jet configuration having different jet-to-ambient temperature ratios corresponding to the experiments by Bridges and Wernet (BW-Exp) [39]. This experimental dataset has been used for the assessment of LES results by many groups [57,58,59,60]. In addition, a similar configuration comprising of a stronger temperature ratio, representative of typical reacting flows (e.g.…”
Section: Unheated and Heated Round Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, [8] and [19] showed that the difference between applying the realistic unsteady inflow condition and the simple initial laminar inflow condition could be very large (O(5dB) in terms of the far-field noise spectra) for the jet flows they considered. On the other hand, for other high-speed jet flows such as considered by [7] or in case of [13] and [14], who considered the same SMC000 nozzle geometry as in the current article, there were laminar inflow conditions used which didn't lead to a drastic deterioration of the solution accuracy compared to the experiment either in terms of the far-field noise spectra or noise-sensitive jet flow properties such as the fourth-order velocity correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The flow conditions inside the nozzle were not recorded and the experimental data available include the flow Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and the far-field microphone measurement data. Thanks to the availability of both the flow data and the far-field acoustic measurement, the SHJAR database has already attracted attention for validation of LES methods [12][13][14] as well as hybrid Rynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS)-LES approaches [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are relatively few high-quality jet noise databases, where both the flow data and the far-field acoustic measurements are available. One of them, the so-called SHJAR (Small Hot Jet Acoustic Rig) [12,13] at NASA has attracted significant attention for validation of LES methods [14][15][16][17] as well as hybrid Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)-LES approaches [18][19][20][21]. In addition to conventional fixed-grid Navier-Stokes methods, alternative unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods of particle-in-cell type such as Lattice Boltzmann (LBM) were tested and showed their computational efficiency for flow and noise predictions for the NASA jet noise problems [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%