2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-009-0037-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating a rapid-update satellite precipitation analysis across telescoping space and time scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By applying the minimum sampling error selection method for time and space proposed by Bell and Kundu (2003), a 15-min averaging time for the rain gauge measurements is needed to minimize the sampling error for a given TMI 85-GHz footprint. The 15-min time average used to minimize the sampling errors appears to be consistent with results of Turk et al (2009) for the statistics of satellite-rain gauge comparisons with various time windows for the average from 230 to 130 min. It has been shown that there is a sharp improvement in the statistics when the time window is widened from 0 to 65 min.…”
Section: B Rain Gauge Datasupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By applying the minimum sampling error selection method for time and space proposed by Bell and Kundu (2003), a 15-min averaging time for the rain gauge measurements is needed to minimize the sampling error for a given TMI 85-GHz footprint. The 15-min time average used to minimize the sampling errors appears to be consistent with results of Turk et al (2009) for the statistics of satellite-rain gauge comparisons with various time windows for the average from 230 to 130 min. It has been shown that there is a sharp improvement in the statistics when the time window is widened from 0 to 65 min.…”
Section: B Rain Gauge Datasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The 15-min time average used to minimize the sampling errors appears to be consistent with results of Turk et al (2009) for the statistics of satellite-rain gauge comparisons with various time windows for the average from 230 to 130 min. 5 of Turk et al 2009), however Thus, we used 14-min averages for the surface rains taken within 67 min centered at a TRMM overpass time. This improvement appears to slow down from 65 to 610 min (see Fig.…”
Section: B Rain Gauge Datasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We have to emphasize that the comparison of radar and satellite data over longer time scales (1 h, 3 h, 6 h, up to 30 days) would provide better statistics as shown in Turk et al, 2009. They have validated the IR-MW-combined NRL-Blended (Naval Research Laboratory -blended) satellite retrieval technique against 1-min rain gauge data over the Korean Peninsula for June-August 2000).…”
Section: Discussion On Satellite-derived Rainfall Ratesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Critically, the validation of instantaneous precipitation products over Europe was very scarce to date. However, dependency on accumulated time and space scales of validation results have been discussed in Turk et al, 2009, where averaging was done from 0.1°to 3°box sizes, and from 1 h to 30 days long periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation of satellite cloud and precipitation retrieval algorithms is a very complex and still in progress activity, which requires dedicated airborne and in situ measurements to obtain the cloudy scenario characterization as well as reliable networks of rain gauges and radar to provide independent rainfall measurements. An exhaustive summary about the recent validation activities of several satellite precipitation products can be extracted from Ebert et al (2007) and Turk et al (2009), whereas examples of performance evaluation of cloud retrieval algorithms can be found in Nauss et al (2005) and Ham et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%