2020
DOI: 10.3390/s21010063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating and Comparing Highly Resolved Commercial “Off the Shelf” PM Monitoring Sensors with Satellite Based Hybrid Models, for Improved Environmental Exposure Assessment

Abstract: Particulate matter is a common health hazard, and under certain conditions, an ecological threat. While many studies were conducted in regard to air pollution and potential effects, this paper serves as a pilot scale investigation into the spatial and temporal variability of particulate matter (PM) pollution in arid urban environments in general, and Beer-Sheva, Israel as a case study. We explore the use of commercially off the shelf (COTS) sensors, which provide an economical solution for spatio-temporal meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary challenge with light-scattering instruments is that the instrument response relies upon both the size distribution and the number of particles, instead of the cumulative mass of aerosol. This limitation could be minimised, and reliability enhanced through periodic calibration against a federal reference method 36 , 42 , 43 . Dylos is also limited by its detection limit of 5 µm, which makes it impossible to measure ultrafine particles that pose a greater risk to humans 34 , 44 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary challenge with light-scattering instruments is that the instrument response relies upon both the size distribution and the number of particles, instead of the cumulative mass of aerosol. This limitation could be minimised, and reliability enhanced through periodic calibration against a federal reference method 36 , 42 , 43 . Dylos is also limited by its detection limit of 5 µm, which makes it impossible to measure ultrafine particles that pose a greater risk to humans 34 , 44 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%