2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating common experiences through focus group interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study had a few limitations: data was collected using a survey and parents or interviewers wrote in responses from families, so there may be nuances that are not reflected. These results were not vetted by parents in the community, and future work might include member-checking (validating the final themes through a second round of discussions with community participants) to ensure these themes resonate with families (Jung et al, 2019 ; Birt et al, 2016 ). However, there were several strengths in this analysis: the mixed-methods approach provides relevant and timely data about the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and families in King County, WA, based on a large, racially and linguistically representative sample with enough power to examine population-specific themes.…”
Section: Conclusion For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study had a few limitations: data was collected using a survey and parents or interviewers wrote in responses from families, so there may be nuances that are not reflected. These results were not vetted by parents in the community, and future work might include member-checking (validating the final themes through a second round of discussions with community participants) to ensure these themes resonate with families (Jung et al, 2019 ; Birt et al, 2016 ). However, there were several strengths in this analysis: the mixed-methods approach provides relevant and timely data about the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and families in King County, WA, based on a large, racially and linguistically representative sample with enough power to examine population-specific themes.…”
Section: Conclusion For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interview started with a description of the participants in the collaborative and their activities. The main findings from the semistructured interviews were validated in a focus group by asking questions on recognizability and necessary additions [15]. After two-third of the interviews, data saturation was discussed and confirmed within the research team.…”
Section: Table 1 Integrated Elderly Care In the Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%