2011
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating Crohnʼs disease activity indices for use in assessing postoperative recurrence

Abstract: The CDAI performs reasonably well in the postoperative setting and 150 appears the best cutpoint for indicating symptomatic disease. However, it is likely not suitable for use as the primary outcome measure. These data suggest that a combination of symptom assessment plus endoscopic evidence of recurrence should remain the gold standard definition for assessing outcomes in postoperative CD trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The k coefficient between endoscopic score ±2 and CDAI score ±150 was 0.12 (p = 0.68), indicating poor agreement. Another study published in the same journal thereafter validated the utility of the CDAI in determining the symptomatic disease recurrence in the postoperative setting [34]. They found that recurrence was well predicted by a CDAI of ‡150 (sensitivity 70% and specificity 81%).…”
Section: Crohn's Disease Activity Indexmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The k coefficient between endoscopic score ±2 and CDAI score ±150 was 0.12 (p = 0.68), indicating poor agreement. Another study published in the same journal thereafter validated the utility of the CDAI in determining the symptomatic disease recurrence in the postoperative setting [34]. They found that recurrence was well predicted by a CDAI of ‡150 (sensitivity 70% and specificity 81%).…”
Section: Crohn's Disease Activity Indexmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Currently, whether a patient has clinical POR is best ascertained by combining CDAI with endoscopy findings. 6 A classification of endoscopic POR-that is, the presence of inflammation in the intestinal mucosa-has been proposed by Rutgeerts et al 7 that is widely accepted. The classification consists of a 0-4 point score system that is validated for risk of developing clinical POR (score 0-1, <10% risk at 10 years; score 2, 40% risk at 5 years; score 3-4, 50-100% risk at 5 years).…”
Section: Definitions Diagnosis and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, clinical POR in this study is a composite end point defined by both the CDAI and endoscopic POR. 6 Fistulae and abscesses are also considered end points of disease recurrence. The primary end point of the study is the proportion of patients with clinical and endoscopic recurrence at 76 weeks, whereas the secondary aim is clinical and endoscopic recurrence at week 104, 152 and 208.…”
Section: Unsolved Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 No clinical activity index including Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) or Harvey-Bradshaw indices has been validated suitably for patients with CD in postoperative setting. [12][13][14] Consequently, the primary endpoint in this study was reoperation indicated for abscess, fistula, perforation, stricture, uncontrolled bleeding, and dysplasia. Perianal procedures, and early laparotomy for complications related to the index surgery (e.g., anastomotic leak, bleeding, evisceration, intra-abdominal abscess), or lysis of adhesions were not considered as reoperation for CD.…”
Section: Biomarker Data and Clinical Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%