2016
DOI: 10.1111/emip.12105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating English Language Proficiency Assessment Uses for English Learners: Academic Language Proficiency and Content Assessment Performance

Abstract: States use standards-based English language proficiency (ELP) assessments to inform relatively high-stakes decisions for English learner (EL) students. Results from these assessments are one of the primary criteria used to determine EL students' level of ELP and readiness for reclassification. The results are also used to evaluate the effectiveness of and funding allocation to district or school programs that serve EL students. In an effort to provide empirical validity evidence for such important uses of ELP … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…General academic language is, in contrast, used across content areas. When we refer to academic language as a whole, we are including both general and discipline-specific language (Anstrom et al, 2010; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008; Wolf & Faulkner-Bond, 2016).…”
Section: The Need For Bolstering Students’ Language Proficiency Within Content Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General academic language is, in contrast, used across content areas. When we refer to academic language as a whole, we are including both general and discipline-specific language (Anstrom et al, 2010; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008; Wolf & Faulkner-Bond, 2016).…”
Section: The Need For Bolstering Students’ Language Proficiency Within Content Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings corroborate the argument made in previous literature about the varied constructs and content represented in different ELP assessments. That is, these variations can impact the composition of the EL population, depending on the types of ELP assessments students take (Solórzano, 2008; Villegas & Pompa, 2020; Wolf et al., 2008; Wolf & Faulkner‐Bond, 2016). The differing ELP growth patterns across the four language domains found in the two states may be artifacts of the specific ELP assessment design (in this case, particularly the speaking domain).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the knowledge of vocabulary and grammar that are deemed necessary for reading comprehension (e.g., Grabe, 1991;Koda, 2007), the attributes were related to language functions. Indeed, K-12 academic language is operationalized as language functions by some language researchers (Wolf & Faulkner-Bond, 2016) such as sequencing, summarizing, inferencing, synthesizing, retelling, anddescribing (e.g., Sato, 2007 in Frantz et al, 2014, p. 442). The attributes specified were also connected with the process of reading.…”
Section: An Evaluation Of the Underlying Attributes In The Selected Q...mentioning
confidence: 99%