2013
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating forest types based on geological and land‐form features in central Amazonia

Abstract: Questions Are topography‐based forest types floristically consistent between sites in central Amazonia? Do broad landform and geological features control site‐specific edaphic and floristic variation and therefore obfuscate the floristic classification based on local topographical classes? Is model‐based clustering a useful tool for floristic classification? Location Non‐inundated forest of central Amazonia, north of the Amazon River. Methods We analysed species presence–absence of a group of terrestrial monoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also measured soil properties on 450 soil profiles to directly assess nutrient availability, niche diversity and long-term ecosystem stability. Geospatial data were also used to account for environmental drivers of regional diversity such as rainfall 13 or geomorphology 17 , which have already shown to be explanatory of broad scale floristic patterns in French Guiana 18 , 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also measured soil properties on 450 soil profiles to directly assess nutrient availability, niche diversity and long-term ecosystem stability. Geospatial data were also used to account for environmental drivers of regional diversity such as rainfall 13 or geomorphology 17 , which have already shown to be explanatory of broad scale floristic patterns in French Guiana 18 , 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the quality of the SoilGrids data layers has not yet been properly assessed, inaccuracies must be expected simply because the density of field sampling in Amazonia is very low and other ecophysiological relevant soil variables, such as concentration of base cations (Ca, Mg, K and Na) and phosphorus are missing in the available soil data. These macronutrients have been shown to be important correlates of floristic patterns and forests structure (Cámara‐Leret, Tuomisto, Ruokolainen, Balslev, & Kristiansen, ; Figueiredo, Costa, Nelson, & Pimentel, ; Higgins et al., ; Quesada et al., ; Tuomisto, Ruokolainen, & Yli‐Halla, , Tuomisto et al., ; Zuquim et al., ). CEC is available, but it did not come out as an important variable in our SDMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and gingers (Figueiredo et al. ). Our results demonstrate that the species and environmental data sets already available in the Amazon region are a good starting point towards better tools and maps for conservation planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%