2009
DOI: 10.1080/03043790903154465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the CDIO syllabus for engineering education using the taxonomy of engineering competencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2008, seven key CDIO standards were introduced in detail, and the standards to be followed and the common mistakes in implementing the CDIO reform in China were pointed out [9] . In 2009, Wang Shuoweng and others expounded the CDIO Competence Outline, summarized the reform ideas that CDIO provided for the cultivation of Applied Undergraduate Talents in China, and no longer confined CDIO to the reform of Engineering education [10] . In 2013, Li Yan and others put forward the reform ideas and ways of foreign language professional ability training on the basis of CDIO [11] .…”
Section: Domestic Research Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, seven key CDIO standards were introduced in detail, and the standards to be followed and the common mistakes in implementing the CDIO reform in China were pointed out [9] . In 2009, Wang Shuoweng and others expounded the CDIO Competence Outline, summarized the reform ideas that CDIO provided for the cultivation of Applied Undergraduate Talents in China, and no longer confined CDIO to the reform of Engineering education [10] . In 2013, Li Yan and others put forward the reform ideas and ways of foreign language professional ability training on the basis of CDIO [11] .…”
Section: Domestic Research Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demands for closing the gap between engineering science and engineering practice in the societal context call for concrete measures in university curricula (Woollacott 2009). Instead of serving merely as a hearth of technological knowledge, disseminating traditional scientific knowledge to engineering graduates, higher engineering education should offer adaptive education that harnesses the students with the ability for critical engagement and thought, interdisciplinary and original thinking, collaborative teamwork, and socialisation into the engineering community of practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3], [4] The growing concerns about the inadequate and too narrowly oriented engineering education evidence the controversy between specialized content and broader orientation towards the societal context, and demands for closing the gap between engineering science and engineering practice call for concrete measures in university curricula. [5] Membership of engineering teams, networks and communities increasingly require not only substancerelated, hard core technological expertise but also socalled soft skills enabling engineers to integrate thinking, feeling and behaviour while pursuing their professional goals. [6] The revision of higher engineering education should therefore aim at transforming the narrow focus and depth of knowledge in a single area into an extended avenue towards full-scale professional expertise.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%