Validating the Comparative Network Framework in a Canada/United States Context

Abstract

The comparative network framework (CNF) has been proposed to move network theory from discussions based largely on understanding local and national systems toward discussions of increasingly common cross-border relationships. Cross-border forms of public organization, such as the Canada/United States Pacific Salmon Commission (PSC), are increasingly utilized to help manage complex regional policy and implementation issues. This article presents the results of survey research designed to test the validity of the CNF within the PSC network structure. The main suggestion is that knowledge of existing subnational, regional and/or national networks (i.e., subnets) can help nations design less contentious cross-border networks (i.e., supranets).