Background
In the digital era, developing effective teaching methods is crucial due to the challenges of sustaining student concentration amidst distractions. This study assessed the effects of learning promoting factors both across group boundaries and within RCT groups from our previously study on effectiveness of online versus live teaching(1).
Methods
The participants’ experience on Concentration, Anticipation, Repeatability, Liking, and effect of Baseline Trigger were evaluated online immediately after the lesson on diagnosing pediatric respiratory issues given either in Live, Live-stream, Vodcast or Podcast setting. The answers were given on 1–10 scale with scores above a median of 8 indicating high experience levels in each factor. Learning was evaluated via a Webropol e-Test immediately and five weeks after the teaching. The 15-minute test, comprising 10 multiple-choice questions and real-life video scenarios, measured both theoretical and diagnostic skills. The test score scale was from − 26 to 28 points.
Results
High concentration was experienced in 70/ 72 students in Live, in 41/ 75 students in Live-stream, in 53/ 72 students in Vodcast and in 36/ 79 students in Podcast teaching groups (P < 0.01). High concentration promoted teaching best, resulting in 1.93 score improvement in short-term test and 1.65 score improvement in long-term test. Among those who could concentrate well, the average test scores were in short-term 23.0 (3.8) in Live, 21.9 (5.1) in Live-streamed, 23.4 (5.2) in Vodcast and 22.1 (4.2) Podcast groups. The results of students with low concentration were 19.0 (2.8), 17.6 (8.2), 20.0 (5.3) and 18.3 (6.1) in the Live, Live-streamed, Vodcast and Podcast groups, respectively.
Conclusion
Concentration is the key to learning. Live teaching method results in the highest levels of concentration, but regardless of the method, good concentration leads to good learning. Therefore, there is a need for diverse strategies to enhance concentration in lessons.