2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the Use of Two-Item Measures of Pain Beliefs and Coping Strategies for a Veteran Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(46 reference statements)
6
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores are measured on a scale of 0 to 6 representing the frequency of use of each pain coping response. Research supports the validity of these 2-item scales on the basis of their strong associations with the parent scales (Pearson r = 0.78 to 0.92), as well as their moderate associations with a variety of criterion variables in samples of patients seeking treatment for chronic pain [22,47]. A recent study supported moderate associations of this brief version of the CSQ with criterion variables in knee OA [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scores are measured on a scale of 0 to 6 representing the frequency of use of each pain coping response. Research supports the validity of these 2-item scales on the basis of their strong associations with the parent scales (Pearson r = 0.78 to 0.92), as well as their moderate associations with a variety of criterion variables in samples of patients seeking treatment for chronic pain [22,47]. A recent study supported moderate associations of this brief version of the CSQ with criterion variables in knee OA [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Relatedly, we relied on a brief measure of pain coping in which scales were formed of only 2 items each. Although the psychometric properties of these short pain coping scales are supported relative to longer instruments [22,47], it may be that these shorter scales are statistically less stable than would be expected if they were composed of more items. However, the efficiency of brief reports of pain coping in busy clinical practices makes them more amenable to patient-centered research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scales of the two-item version showed strong correlations with their respective parent subscales, which supported construct validity. Moreover, the two-item version had adequate sensitivity to change and criterion-related validity [31][32][33]. A Catalan version of the two-item version of the CPCI was developed for this study using the back translation method suggested by Berkanovic [34].…”
Section: Predictive Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such data reduction was felt to be necessary given the highly-skewed distribution although the effect of this is that increases or decreases in the frequency of use of different coping strategies could not be directly quantified. The 2-item CSQ has recently been validated in older adults 50 but misclassification will be higher for the 1-item version. Several recommended treatments were not included in our study (eg aids and adaptations, supports/braces, general aerobic exercise) or the source (eg prescribed vs OTC) not specified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%