2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41394-018-0083-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Van Lieshout test in an Italian population with cervical spinal cord injury: a psychometric study

Abstract: The IT-VLT was a reliable and a valid outcome measure for assessing hand function in the Italian population with C-SCI. The present study lays the grounds to investigate the psychometric properties of the short version of the IT-VLT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…association in the last few years has dealt with several systematic reviews and the validation of many outcome measures in Italy. [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] Summary of the quality of the evidence…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…association in the last few years has dealt with several systematic reviews and the validation of many outcome measures in Italy. [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] Summary of the quality of the evidence…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research group has carried out many outcome measures in Italy. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The purpose of this study was to translate the MROC Scale into Italian and adapt it culturally and validate it. Translation and cultural adaptation have been carried out applying internationally recognized methods, and experts have also ensured that the original meaning of the scale is maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…association in the last few years has dealt with several systematic reviews and the validation of many outcome measures in Italy. [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76] The data available in the literature before February 2017 allowed for the identification of 33 different fall risk assessment tools, but it is still not possible to identify one that is usable at any time and in any setting. Even with a setting stratification, it was not possible to reach definitive recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%