2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and diurnal variation evaluation of MERRA-2 multiple aerosol properties on a global scale

Xin Su,
Yuhang Huang,
Lunche Wang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall increase of nighttime AOD with respect to daytime can be attributed to various factors, including a decrease in the height of the mixed layer with less horizontal mixing and transportation, a reduction in the atmospheric environmental capacity, an increase in relative humidity, enhanced aerosol hygroscopic growth, or intensified pollution emissions (Brock et al., 2016). Similar differences (i.e., higher AOD for nighttime) have been noted in previous studies (Perrone et al., 2022; Song et al., 2018; Su et al., 2023). Nonetheless, studies on nighttime aerosol properties are quite limited and additional analysis is needed to fully explain these differences, which is beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The overall increase of nighttime AOD with respect to daytime can be attributed to various factors, including a decrease in the height of the mixed layer with less horizontal mixing and transportation, a reduction in the atmospheric environmental capacity, an increase in relative humidity, enhanced aerosol hygroscopic growth, or intensified pollution emissions (Brock et al., 2016). Similar differences (i.e., higher AOD for nighttime) have been noted in previous studies (Perrone et al., 2022; Song et al., 2018; Su et al., 2023). Nonetheless, studies on nighttime aerosol properties are quite limited and additional analysis is needed to fully explain these differences, which is beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%