2015
DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2016.1143693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and monitoring of pesticide residues in honey using QuEChERS and gas chromatographic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of these residues was 65.6% for imidacloprid and 15% for acetamiprid. Nadaf et al [ 89 ] reported the presence of pesticide residues in 28 of 30 analyzed samples. Aldrin, endosulfan, chlorpyrifos-methyl, and lindane residues were similar to our study, but the concentrations found were much higher than those found by us.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of these residues was 65.6% for imidacloprid and 15% for acetamiprid. Nadaf et al [ 89 ] reported the presence of pesticide residues in 28 of 30 analyzed samples. Aldrin, endosulfan, chlorpyrifos-methyl, and lindane residues were similar to our study, but the concentrations found were much higher than those found by us.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%