Abstract:Continuous bioprocessing holds the potential to improve product consistency, accelerate productivity, and lower cost of production. However, switching a bioprocess from traditional batch to continuous mode requires surmounting business and regulatory challenges. A key regulatory requirement for all biopharmaceuticals is virus safety, which is assured through a combination of testing and virus clearance through purification unit operations. For continuous processing, unit operations such as capture chromatograp… Show more
“…Previous studies on the viral clearance capability of continuous chromatography have shown that alternate modes of capture do not affect this capability of viral removal. 56,57 The AEX step in these processes remains unchanged in how load material is applied (i.e., directly from an intermediate pool, and not directly from a prior column eluate), and so its viral removal capability would not differ for this robust viral clearance step. Therefore, quality attributes can be reliably controlled for intensified fed-batch manufacturing processes.…”
Process intensification has shown great potential to increase productivity and reduce costs in biomanufacturing. This case study describes the evolution of a manufacturing process from a conventional processing scheme at 1000-L scale (Process A, n = 5) to intensified processing schemes at both 1000-L (Process B, n = 8) and 2000-L scales (Process C, n = 3) for the production of a monoclonal antibody by a Chinese hamster ovary cell line. For the upstream part of the process, we implemented an intensified seed culture scheme to enhance cell densities at the seed culture step (N-1) prior to the production bioreactor (N) by using either enriched N-1 seed culture medium for Process B or by operating the N-1 step in perfusion mode for Process C. The increased final cell densities at the N-1 step allowed for much higher inoculation densities in the production bioreactor operated in fed-batch mode and substantially increased titers by 4-fold from Process A to B and 8-fold from Process A to C, while maintaining comparable final product quality. Multiple changes were made to intensify the downstream process to accommodate the increased titers. New high-capacity resins were implemented for the Protein A and anion exchange chromatography (AEX) steps, and the cation exchange chromatography (CEX) step was changed from bind-elute to flow-through mode for the streamlined Process B. Multi-column chromatography was developed for Protein A capture, and an integrated AEX-CEX pool-less polishing steps allowed semi-continuous Process C with increased productivity as well as reductions in resin requirements, buffer consumption, and processing times. A cost-of-goods analysis on consumables showed 6.7-10.1 fold cost reduction from the conventional Process A to the intensified Process C. The hybrid-intensified process described here is easy to implement in manufacturing and lays a good foundation to develop a fully continuous manufacturing with even higher productivity in the future.
“…Previous studies on the viral clearance capability of continuous chromatography have shown that alternate modes of capture do not affect this capability of viral removal. 56,57 The AEX step in these processes remains unchanged in how load material is applied (i.e., directly from an intermediate pool, and not directly from a prior column eluate), and so its viral removal capability would not differ for this robust viral clearance step. Therefore, quality attributes can be reliably controlled for intensified fed-batch manufacturing processes.…”
Process intensification has shown great potential to increase productivity and reduce costs in biomanufacturing. This case study describes the evolution of a manufacturing process from a conventional processing scheme at 1000-L scale (Process A, n = 5) to intensified processing schemes at both 1000-L (Process B, n = 8) and 2000-L scales (Process C, n = 3) for the production of a monoclonal antibody by a Chinese hamster ovary cell line. For the upstream part of the process, we implemented an intensified seed culture scheme to enhance cell densities at the seed culture step (N-1) prior to the production bioreactor (N) by using either enriched N-1 seed culture medium for Process B or by operating the N-1 step in perfusion mode for Process C. The increased final cell densities at the N-1 step allowed for much higher inoculation densities in the production bioreactor operated in fed-batch mode and substantially increased titers by 4-fold from Process A to B and 8-fold from Process A to C, while maintaining comparable final product quality. Multiple changes were made to intensify the downstream process to accommodate the increased titers. New high-capacity resins were implemented for the Protein A and anion exchange chromatography (AEX) steps, and the cation exchange chromatography (CEX) step was changed from bind-elute to flow-through mode for the streamlined Process B. Multi-column chromatography was developed for Protein A capture, and an integrated AEX-CEX pool-less polishing steps allowed semi-continuous Process C with increased productivity as well as reductions in resin requirements, buffer consumption, and processing times. A cost-of-goods analysis on consumables showed 6.7-10.1 fold cost reduction from the conventional Process A to the intensified Process C. The hybrid-intensified process described here is easy to implement in manufacturing and lays a good foundation to develop a fully continuous manufacturing with even higher productivity in the future.
“…In the case of manufacturing therapeutics using CHO cells, viral clearance is mandatory (Chiang et al, 2019;Jungbauer, 2019). Viral clearance for mAbs production processes uses a low pH hold because the protein elution occurs at low pH from a Protein A chromatography column.…”
Section: Continuous Viral Inactivation and Clearancementioning
Infectious diseases, along with cancers, are among the main causes of death among humans worldwide. The production of therapeutic proteins for treating diseases at large scale for millions of individuals is one of the essential needs of mankind. Recent progress in the area of recombinant DNA technologies has paved the way to producing recombinant proteins that can be used as therapeutics, vaccines, and diagnostic reagents. Recombinant proteins for these applications are mainly produced using prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression host systems such as mammalian cells, bacteria, yeast, insect cells, and transgenic plants at laboratory scale as well as in large-scale settings. The development of efficient bioprocessing strategies is crucial for industrial production of recombinant proteins of therapeutic and prophylactic importance. Recently, advances have been made in the various areas of bioprocessing and are being utilized to develop effective processes for producing recombinant proteins. These include the use of high-throughput devices for effective bioprocess optimization and of disposable systems, continuous upstream processing, continuous chromatography, integrated continuous bioprocessing, Quality by Design, and process analytical technologies to achieve quality product with higher yield. This review summarizes recent developments in the bioprocessing of recombinant proteins, including in various expression systems, bioprocess development, and the upstream and downstream processing of recombinant proteins.
“…Four to five steps are evaluated for viral reduction, including protein A and other column chromatography steps where the mAb is bound and other components flow through (see Box 2 for difficulties in viral detection). Rapid Viral Detection: A Difficult Challenge Current methods for detecting viruses are based on PCR assays, animal infection susceptibility, immune responses, or cell culture infectivity assays [ 36 , 69 ]. Methods, such as reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification [ 70 ] and next-generation sequencing, hold the potential to decrease the amount of time required for detecting viruses while maintaining the same limits of detection as traditional methods (one viral copy per cell).…”
Section: Downstream Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current methods for detecting viruses are based on PCR assays, animal infection susceptibility, immune responses, or cell culture infectivity assays [ 36 , 69 ]. Methods, such as reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification [ 70 ] and next-generation sequencing, hold the potential to decrease the amount of time required for detecting viruses while maintaining the same limits of detection as traditional methods (one viral copy per cell).…”
Process analytical technology (PAT) for the manufacture of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is defined by an integrated set of advanced and automated methods that analyze the compositions and biophysical properties of cell culture fluids, cell-free product streams, and biotherapeutic molecules that are ultimately formulated into concentrated products. In-line or near-line probes and systems are remarkably well developed, although challenges remain in the determination of the absence of viral loads, detecting microbial or mycoplasma contamination, and applying data-driven deep learning to process monitoring and soft sensors. In this review, we address the current status of PAT for both batch and continuous processing steps and discuss its potential impact on facilitating the continuous manufacture of biotherapeutics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citationsâcitations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
