2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06320-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and predictive capacity of a Dutch version of the FLARE-RA questionnaire within the context of a TNFi-tapering trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, while using pure patient reporting as definition of flare may not be ideal (see concept of T2T), our aim was to use a patient-based anchor, but to then map it to objective scales that are also proposed for T2T. Definitions of flares that are solely based on patient reports have been proposed previously,29–33 but have not yet reached use in clinical trials or as monitoring tools. In fact, various studies underlined the importance of swollen joint counts, which are associated with longer-term structural progression; similarly, this is true for acute phase reactants 34–36…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, while using pure patient reporting as definition of flare may not be ideal (see concept of T2T), our aim was to use a patient-based anchor, but to then map it to objective scales that are also proposed for T2T. Definitions of flares that are solely based on patient reports have been proposed previously,29–33 but have not yet reached use in clinical trials or as monitoring tools. In fact, various studies underlined the importance of swollen joint counts, which are associated with longer-term structural progression; similarly, this is true for acute phase reactants 34–36…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%