2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01048-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and standardization of DNA extraction and library construction methods for metagenomics-based human fecal microbiome measurements

Abstract: Background Validation and standardization of methodologies for microbial community measurements by high-throughput sequencing are needed to support human microbiome research and its industrialization. This study set out to establish standards-based solutions to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of metagenomics-based microbiome profiling of human fecal samples. Results In the first phase, we performed a head-to-head comparison of a wide range… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in the present study, we collected fecal samples with a kit containing DNA stabilizer. It is known that the different isolation protocols may vary in terms of efficiency, depending on the physical and chemical matrix of the sample; and, thus, the recommended kits for the isolation of DNA from stool samples might be desirable [ 47 ]. In addition, we selected 5000 reads per sample were used for the evaluation, and therefore there is a possibly that the analysis might not be very deep; however the Good’s coverage index of the 5000 reads per sample in this study exceeded 0.98, indicating a high coverage degree which was a sufficient reads number for this fecal microbiome analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in the present study, we collected fecal samples with a kit containing DNA stabilizer. It is known that the different isolation protocols may vary in terms of efficiency, depending on the physical and chemical matrix of the sample; and, thus, the recommended kits for the isolation of DNA from stool samples might be desirable [ 47 ]. In addition, we selected 5000 reads per sample were used for the evaluation, and therefore there is a possibly that the analysis might not be very deep; however the Good’s coverage index of the 5000 reads per sample in this study exceeded 0.98, indicating a high coverage degree which was a sufficient reads number for this fecal microbiome analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, low biomass alone does not explain the strong taxon effect on read assignment. We suspect that the most important cause for the strong taxon effects is likely caused by differences in DNA yields among different taxa (Sato et al, 2019;Schiebelhut, Abboud, Daglio, Swift, & Dawson, 2017;Tourlousse et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this, DNA was extracted from the suspension using the Magtration System 12GC and GC series MagDEA DNA 200 (Precision System Science Co., Ltd., Matsudo, Japan). The final DNA concentration (10 ng/μL) was subjected to the analysis of the microbial community structure by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and next-generation sequencing using the MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at TechnoSuruga Laboratory Co., Ltd. [ 29 , 30 , 32 ]. Bioinformatic analysis was performed using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Multiclassifier tool and Metagenome@KIN software (World Fusion Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) based on data from bacterial species as determined by RDP taxonomic analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%