2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2012.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation d’une mesure de climat de groupe chez des adolescentes en centre de réadaptation : le vécu éducatif partagé au travers de trois dimensions essentielles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They rely on others in stressful circumstances as a way to reduce stress (Cardoso et al, 2013). Mathys et al (2013) found girls in residential youth care to be extra receptive for positive (peer-) relationships, a finding that has also been reported for incarcerated adult females (Slotboom et al, 2011), which can be explained by girl's tendency to engage in interpersonal relationships (Buhrmester & Furman, 1987). Girls' orientation toward engaging in interpersonal relationships might also be associated with deviancy-training through reinforcement of a friend's behavior.…”
Section: The Role Of Gender In Peer Interactions In Residential Youthmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They rely on others in stressful circumstances as a way to reduce stress (Cardoso et al, 2013). Mathys et al (2013) found girls in residential youth care to be extra receptive for positive (peer-) relationships, a finding that has also been reported for incarcerated adult females (Slotboom et al, 2011), which can be explained by girl's tendency to engage in interpersonal relationships (Buhrmester & Furman, 1987). Girls' orientation toward engaging in interpersonal relationships might also be associated with deviancy-training through reinforcement of a friend's behavior.…”
Section: The Role Of Gender In Peer Interactions In Residential Youthmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This questionnaire was developed to measure peer interactions in residential youth care in terms of positive (prosocial) interactions -including peer acceptance, mutual trust, and peer support -and negative (antisocial) interactions -including relational aggression, exclusion, rejection of peers, and deviancy training. The PIRY was modeled after a French measure of group climate developed for justice-involved girls (Questionnaire de Climat de Groupe en Center de Réadaptation [QCGCR], Mathys et al, 2013). Items referring to peer (group) interactions were adapted for youth of both sexes, in particular items of the scale for Peer relation (e.g., "I can ask the girls in my unit for help when I need it" and "I have warm and friendly relationships with the girls in the unit").…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we found less indirect aggression in girls-only groups than in mixed gender or boys-only groups, even when controlled for individual gender differences in aggression at T2, and initial levels of aggression. First, because girls have been found to display a stronger relational orientation than boys (Taylor et al 2000 ; Zahn-Waxler et al 2005 ), and as they tend to particularly emphasize the importance of harmonious peer relationships in residential youth care (Mathys et al 2013 ), they might derive more support from their relationships with other girls in same-gender living groups, reducing levels of indirect (i.e., relational) aggression. Moreover, they might find it easier to discuss gender-specific recovery issues in same-gender groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il s'agit ici du PCÉC dont il a été question dans les sections sur la RD et la RÉI. Une esquisse de recherche quasi-expérimentale a été employée (Lanctôt 2005(Lanctôt , 2010(Lanctôt , 2011(Lanctôt , 2012(Lanctôt , 2015Lanctôt et Lemieux, 2012;Mathys, Lanctôt et Touchette, 2013;Hauth-Charlier et Lemieux, 2015;Lemieux et Mathys, 2016;Ayotte, Lanctôt et Tourigny, 2016). Des adolescentes d'unités du CJM, le groupe expérimental (GE, 104), recevaient le PCÉC et elles étaient comparées à des adolescentes (78) qui étaient hébergées dans des unités de réadaptation d'un autre CJ, le groupe de comparaison (GC) qui ne recevait pas le PCÉC.…”
Section: L'efficacité D'un Programme Intégré Avec Des Adolescentes Antisocialesunclassified