Validation guidelines for PCR workflows in bioterrorism preparedness, food safety and forensics

Abstract

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the backbone of contemporary DNA/RNA analysis, ideally enabling detection of one or just a few target molecules. However, when analysing food or forensic samples the analytical procedure is often challenged by low amounts of poor quality template molecules and complex matrices. Applying optimised and validated methods in all steps of the analysis workflow, i.e. sampling, sample treatment, DNA/RNA extraction and PCR (including reverse transcription for RNA analysis), is thus necessary to ensure the reliability of analysis. In this paper, we describe how in-house validation can be performed for the different modules of the diagnostic PCR process, providing practical examples as tools for laboratories in their planning of validation studies. The focus is analysis of heterogeneous samples with interfering matrices, with relevance in food testing, forensic DNA analysis, bioterrorism preparedness and veterinary medicine. Our objective is to enable rational in-house validation for reliable and swift quality assurance when results are urgent, for example in the event of a crisis such as a foodborne outbreak or a crime requiring the analysis of a large number of diverse samples. To that end, we explain the performance characteristics associated with method validation from a PCR and biological sample matrix perspective and suggest which characteristics to investigate depending on the type of method to be validated. Also, we include a modular approach to validation within the PCR workflow, aiming at efficient validation and a flexible use of methods.

PCR inhibition in qPCR, dPCR and MPS—mechanisms and solutions

“…An increased awareness of the effects that PCR inhibitors can have on the analysis is crucial to ensure that reliable results are generated. Measures for troubleshooting include the assessment of relevant sample types and matrices in method validation [117], as well as implementation of quality control measures such as IACs. For many molecules, the mechanism of inhibition has not been elucidated, i.e.…”

“…This entails applying proper quality assurance and quality control measures [115,116]. Method validation is a prerequisite prior to implementation to ensure that the methods perform well for the samples of interest [117]. Apart from the general performance characteristics that should be investigated in a validation study (e.g.…”

Missing the Match Might Not Cost You the Game: Primer-Template Mismatches Studied in Different Hepatitis A Virus Variants

“…It is clear that the effects of mismatches appear to be highly context-dependent (Stadhouders et al 2010), and may thus be difficult to predict in silico. Experimental verification of the inclusivity is therefore necessary as a complement to in silico analyses (Hedman et al 2018).…”

Advances in identifying GM plants: toward the routine detection of ‘hidden’ and ‘new’ GMOs

“…Even in the case of backcrossing, of supposedly fully independant traits or genes i.e. without haplotype etc., to reach the theoretical limit of about 98% varietal purity, more than 500 million base pairs in the case of wheat would not be affected by this genome 'cleaning' (Baltes et al, 2017;Bertheau, 2019;Glenn et al, 2017;Hedman et al, 2018;Holland, 2007;Hollick, 2017;Kumar et al, 2014).…”