Validation of 3 years of ozone measurements over Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change station Lauder, New Zealand

Brinksma, E. J.; Bergwerff, J. B.; Bodeker, G. E.; Boersma, K. F.; Boyd, I. S.; Connor, B. J.; Haan, J. F. de; Hogervorst, W.; Hovenier, J. W.; Parrish, A.; Tsou, J. J.; Zawodny, J. M.; Swart, D. P. J.

doi:10.1029/2000jd900143

Cited by 24 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The earlier reports on SAGE-II measurement illustrated that the error in ozone retrieval rapidly increases up to approximately 40% at 10 km Brinksma et al, 2000) which is in accordance with the result presented here. Brinksma et al (2000) concluded that the SAGE-II ozone measurements become less consistent with decreasing altitude.…”

Section: Height Profile Of Mean Ozonesupporting

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stratospheric ozone climatology and variability over a southern subtropical site: Reunion Island (21° S; 55° E)

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The study presents the climatological characteristics of stratospheric ozone observed over Reunion Island using in-situ (ozonesonde and SAOZ) and satellite (UARS-HALOE, SAGE-II and TOMS) measurements. It uses colocalised ozonesondes (from September 1992 to February 2005) and SAOZ measurements (from January 1993 to December 2004), SAGE-II data from October 1984 to February 1999 (∼15 years), HALOE data from January 1991 to February 2005 (∼15 years), and NIMBUS/TOMS data from January 1978 to December 2004 (27 years). The satellite measurements correspond to overpasses located nearby Reunion Island (21 • S; 55 • E). The height profiles of ozone concentration obtained from ozonesonde (0.5-29.5 km) show less bias in comparison with the HALOE and SAGE-II measurements. Though, the satellite (HALOE and SAGE-II) measurements underestimate the tropospheric ozone, they are in good agreement for the heights above 15 km. The bias between the measurements and the normalized ozone profile constructed from the ozonesonde and SAGE-II satellite measurement shows that the SAGE-II measurements are more accurate than the HALOE measurements in the lower stratosphere. The monthly variation of ozone concentration derived from ozonesonde and HALOE shows a nearly annual cycle with a maximum concentration during winter/spring and minimum concentration during summer/autumn months. The time evolution of total column ozone obtained from TOMS, SAOZ and the one computed from ozonesonde and SAGE-II, exhibits similar behaviour with analogous trends as above. The TOMS variation displays a higher value of total column ozone of about 3-5 DU (10%) in comparison with the SAOZ and the integrated ozone from ozonesonde and SAGE-II.

show abstract

Section: Height Profile Of Mean Ozonesupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Brinksma et al (2000) concluded that the SAGE-II ozone measurements become less consistent with decreasing altitude. The inter-comparison study by Lu et al (1997) also provided similar results by showing the difference between HALOE and ozonesonde.…”

Section: Height Profile Of Mean Ozonementioning

confidence: 99%

Stratospheric ozone climatology and variability over a southern subtropical site: Reunion Island (21° S; 55° E)

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All lidar data used in this study were provided by the NDACC community (www.ndacc.org; see also Steinbrecht et al, 2009a, b;McDermid et al, 1990McDermid et al, , 1995Brinksma et al, 2000). These lidars (at Hohenpeissenberg, Lauder, Mauna Loa, Haute Provence and Table Mountain) use the differential absorption lidar (DIAL) Technique (Megie et al, 1977) to derive stratospheric ozone profiles from atmospheric measurements.…”

Section: Lidarsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Drift-corrected trends and periodic variations in MIPAS IMK/IAA ozone measurements

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Drifts, trends and periodic variations were calculated from monthly zonally averaged ozone profiles. The ozone profiles were derived from level-1b data of the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) by means of the scientific level-2 processor run by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK). All trend and drift analyses were performed using a multilinear parametric trend model which includes a linear term, several harmonics with period lengths from 3 to 24 months and the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). Drifts at 2-sigma significance level were mainly negative for ozone relative to Aura MLS and Odin OSIRIS and negative or near zero for most of the comparisons to lidar measurements. Lidar stations used here include those at Hohenpeissenberg

show abstract

“…The Dobson algorithm does not account for the temperature dependence of the ozone absorption cross sections. For southern midlatitudes the effect of this dependence is small, between 1 and 2% in the annual cycle [ Brinksma et al , 2000]. This effect is larger in the Antarctic.…”

Section: Data Setsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground‐based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[1] Six data sets of monthly average zonal total ozone were intercompared and then used to estimate latitudinal and global total ozone temporal variations and trends. The data sets were prepared by different groups and are based on TOMS, SBUV-SBUV/2, GOME, and ground-based measurements. Different approaches have been used to homogenize the records over the period 1979-2000. Systematic differences of up to 3% were found between different data sets for zonal and global total ozone area weighted average values. However, when these systematic differences were removed by deseasonalizing the data, the residuals agreed to within ±0.5% of the long-term mean ozone values. All data sets show changes in the rate of the total ozone decline in recent years. While global ozone was fairly constant during the 1990s, the average values of the 1990s are about 2-3% lower than those of the late 1970s. About 38% of the global ozone is located between 25°S and 25°N where the data show no decline. The strongest decline and the largest variability occur over the 35°N-60°N zone during the winter-spring season with the largest negative deviations occurring in 1993 and 1995. The decline in autumn is much smaller at these latitudes. Over the 35°S-60°S zone the ozone decline shows less seasonal dependence, and the largest deviations there were observed in 1985 and 1997. Sliding 11-year trends were calculated to estimate ozone changes over different time intervals

show abstract

Validation of 3 years of ozone measurements over Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change station Lauder, New Zealand

Cited by 24 publications

References 23 publications

Stratospheric ozone climatology and variability over a southern subtropical site: Reunion Island (21° S; 55° E)

Stratospheric ozone climatology and variability over a southern subtropical site: Reunion Island (21° S; 55° E)

Drift-corrected trends and periodic variations in MIPAS IMK/IAA ozone measurements

Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground‐based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About