2019
DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.39.12.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a brief version of the Social Provisions Scale using Canadian national survey data

Abstract: Introduction The 10-item Social Provisions Scale (SPS-10) has been implemented to measure social support in a number of national surveys in Canada. The objective of this study was to reduce the SPS-10 to a brief, five-item scale (SPS-5), while maintaining adequate measurement properties. Methods Data from individuals aged 18 years and older who responded to the Social Provisions Scale module in the Canadian Community Health Survey 2012 Mental Health Focus cycle (CCHS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To find out if the status of mothers and patients differs between high and low social support groups, we divided the mothers into two groups based on the cutoff score for the SPS-10, which was 30 (i.e., if greater than or equal to 30, high-score group; if lower than 30, low-score group). As previous studies had used a cutoff SPS-10 score of 30 with valid results, the same point was used in this study [37]. Then, we compared mothers' GSES, ULS, ALAS, BDI-II, and K6 scores as well as patients' RSS, ULS, YAS, FAD, and EDI scores between the high-and low-scoring groups using unpaired t-tests, with p < 0.05 as significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find out if the status of mothers and patients differs between high and low social support groups, we divided the mothers into two groups based on the cutoff score for the SPS-10, which was 30 (i.e., if greater than or equal to 30, high-score group; if lower than 30, low-score group). As previous studies had used a cutoff SPS-10 score of 30 with valid results, the same point was used in this study [37]. Then, we compared mothers' GSES, ULS, ALAS, BDI-II, and K6 scores as well as patients' RSS, ULS, YAS, FAD, and EDI scores between the high-and low-scoring groups using unpaired t-tests, with p < 0.05 as significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, social provision was measured using the social provision scale (SPS), which comprises 10 items from five of the six dimensions of social support originally provided by Weiss [ 40 ]. The psychometric properties of the SPS10 items were discussed in previous studies [ 35 , 41 , 42 ]. The responses for each of the 10 items range from strongly agree (4), agree (3), disagree (2), to strongly disagree (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability and validity testing has found the SPS to be an acceptable measurement tool. [31][32][33][34] Like the FS, this measure was also given pre-and postintervention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%