2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-006-0066-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine

Abstract: Very few finite element models on the lumbosacral spine have been reported because of its unique biomechanical characteristics. In addition, most of these lumbosacral spine models have been only validated with rotation at single moment values, ignoring the inherent nonlinear nature of the moment-rotation response of the spine. Because a majority of lumbar spine surgeries are performed between L4 and S1 levels, and the confidence in the stress analysis output depends on the model validation, the objective of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,22,37,41,47,55 To measure the deviation of our model from the SD corridors we have introduced percent of load range deviation to show the amount of the loading range in which the model is within the corridors. It is apparent from Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,22,37,41,47,55 To measure the deviation of our model from the SD corridors we have introduced percent of load range deviation to show the amount of the loading range in which the model is within the corridors. It is apparent from Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anulus fibrosis of the intervertebral disk was assumed to follow an isotropic hypoelastic law [9]. The polynomial form of strain energy potential was chosen from the ABA-QUS material library.…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational and finite element models have been developed in previous studies, to simulate varying levels of complexity in the spinal geometry-from individual intervertebral discs [8] and spinal motion segments [9,10,14,21] to whole spine osseous/osseoligamentous models [2,6,11,15]. Increasingly, it is becoming desirable to base these models on patient specific rather than average or idealized data, in order to simulate the specific response of a patient's spinal anatomy to surgical procedures [3,5,6,11,12,15]. Thus, in this study of cadaveric specimens, subject specific geometry for the intervertebral disc was obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%