2019
DOI: 10.9734/jpri/2018/45959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Screening Tetracycline Residues in Foods of Animal Origin from the Perspective of Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The results show that, CCβ for the validated antimicrobials were below or equal to the MRL for all drug residues in this study, with the exception of tilmcosin which was residues in the muscle of chicken, beef, and shrimp, which detected the same at 100 ppb (MRL) [24].…”
Section: Detection Capability For the Different Antimicrobials In Selmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…1. The results show that, CCβ for the validated antimicrobials were below or equal to the MRL for all drug residues in this study, with the exception of tilmcosin which was residues in the muscle of chicken, beef, and shrimp, which detected the same at 100 ppb (MRL) [24].…”
Section: Detection Capability For the Different Antimicrobials In Selmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…1 The detection capabilities and maximum residue limits for the different antimicrobials antimicrobials involved in the study were within the 5% requirement of the EU decision 2002/657, and therefore the validation results are satisfactory. The Charm II technique exhibited better CCβ for tetracyclines at 25 ppb (0.25 MRL) compared to other rapid screening techniques such as the ELISA kit of R-Biopharm for screening tetracycline antibiotic residues in the muscle of chicken, beef, and shrimp, which detected the same at 100 ppb (MRL) [27]. In another study, results of the revolutionary Biochip Array Technology showed better detectability for tylosin A and oxytetracycline at 0.10 and 0.5 of the respective MRL in samples [28].…”
Section: Detection Capability For the Different Antimicrobials In Selmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the case Fm < T the false positive rate is below 5%. If more than 5% of the spiked samples at the screening target concentration gave a response greater than the cut-off level (deemed false negative), the concentration chosen for the spiking is considered too low for validation and a higher concentration is tested [26,27]. From the results presented in Table 3, the Fm values obtained using the EU guideline and the respective calculated CP according to the Charm II protocol are comparable.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Control Points For The Different Drug Resimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the incidences of false negative results observed for all antibiotics involved in the study were within the 5% requirement of the EU decision 2002/657, and therefore the validation results are satisfactory. The Charm II technique exhibited better detection capability for tetracyclines at 25 ppb (0.25 MRL) compared to other rapid screening techniques such as the ELISA kit of R-Biopharm for screening tetracycline antibiotic residues in the muscle of chicken, beef, and shrimp, which detected the same at 100 ppb (MRL) [27]. In another study, results of the revolutionary Biochip Array Technology showed better detectability for tylosin and oxytetracycline at 0.10 and 0.5 of the respective MRL in samples [28].…”
Section: Detection Capability For the Different Antimicrobials In Selmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the case Fm < T the false positive rate is below 5%. If more than 5% of the spiked samples at the screening target concentration gave a response greater than the cutoff level (deemed false negative), the concentration chosen for the spiking is considered too low for validation and a higher concentration is tested [26,27].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Control Points For The Different Drug Resimentioning
confidence: 99%