2018
DOI: 10.1177/0018720818783507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Driving Simulator Study on Driver Behavior at Passive Rail Level Crossings

Abstract: This study also provides support for the findings of previous driving simulator studies conducted to evaluate compliance and approach speeds of passive level crossings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the evidence suggests that of all the driver-related factors, unintentional errors are far more commonplace than deliberate violations ( 11 14 ). The main factors leading to such errors are: insufficient sighting distances, or limited conspicuity of the warning signs and/or approaching train; drivers’ lack of awareness of the required response to passive crossing warning signs; drivers’ inability to correctly assess if sufficient time is available to safely complete the crossing ( 15 ), particularly on account of poor ability to estimate the speed of trains as they approach ( 16 ); inattention as a result of complacency caused by low expectations of encountering a train ( 17 ), or distraction ( 18 ); and the so-called “looked-but-failed-to-see” error ( 10 ), in which drivers fail to identify hazards despite looking at the hazard’s source, largely resulting from limitations in human information processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the evidence suggests that of all the driver-related factors, unintentional errors are far more commonplace than deliberate violations ( 11 14 ). The main factors leading to such errors are: insufficient sighting distances, or limited conspicuity of the warning signs and/or approaching train; drivers’ lack of awareness of the required response to passive crossing warning signs; drivers’ inability to correctly assess if sufficient time is available to safely complete the crossing ( 15 ), particularly on account of poor ability to estimate the speed of trains as they approach ( 16 ); inattention as a result of complacency caused by low expectations of encountering a train ( 17 ), or distraction ( 18 ); and the so-called “looked-but-failed-to-see” error ( 10 ), in which drivers fail to identify hazards despite looking at the hazard’s source, largely resulting from limitations in human information processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several limitations of our study warrant discussion. First, although driving simulation systems are considered an efficient and safe means of allowing the simulation of high-risk collisions that occur in real-world driving environments, the question of how to elicit similar driving behaviors when using driving simulation systems as a research tool as in the real-world driving environments is an ongoing research topic [ 22 , 30 , 31 ]. Thus, the results we obtained might not fully reflect the situation of a true driving environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field driving studies (FDS) monitor driver behavior using instrumented vehicles; even with the use of monitoring equipment, instructors are frequently present in the vehicle to record measurements and code driving performance [129], [130]. The driver behavior data under the precise control of the experiment could also be obtained in the driving simulator test (driving simulator study) [131].…”
Section: B Driver Behavior Studies Types (Rq2)mentioning
confidence: 99%