2009
DOI: 10.1518/107118109x12524443346077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Dry Electrode System for EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interesting direct-contact non skin invasive dry electrodes are the arrays of metallic pins [14,1,15], that have the advantage of being able to go through the hair of most of the subjects (2 subjects out of 7 reported in [1] as excluded from the experiment on this ground).…”
Section: Background and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interesting direct-contact non skin invasive dry electrodes are the arrays of metallic pins [14,1,15], that have the advantage of being able to go through the hair of most of the subjects (2 subjects out of 7 reported in [1] as excluded from the experiment on this ground).…”
Section: Background and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…without signal amplification and impedance adapter on site), that improves existing pin-based non skin invasive dry EEG electrodes [14,1,15] in that it reduces the reported discomfort by distributing the pressure on the skin of the scalp more uniformly and more flexibly. The novelty consists in using flexible conductive bristles instead of pins.…”
Section: Background and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the notch filter is worse, particularly for the low 5 Hz impedance measurement. To put these figures in context, typical correlation coefficients when comparing the performance of different EEG electrode types are: >0.93 [10]; 0.89 [11]; 0.83 [12]; 0.81-0.98 [13]; 0.68-0.90 [14]; 0.39-0.85 [15]. Using both in-band impedance methods the correlation coefficients are larger than these, indicating a minimal loss of information, equivalent to changing the electrode type used.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical values reported are: >0.93 [3]; 0.89 [22]; 0.83 [23]; 0.81-0.98 [15]; 0.68-0.90 [16]; 0.39-0.85 [24]. For greater acceptance of dry electrodes the wider reporting of the second order electrode properties is essential.…”
Section: Electrode Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%