2015
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a food frequency questionnaire to determine vitamin D intakes using the method of triads

Abstract: The method of triads was applied using these three measurements to determine the overall validity of the FFQ. Results: Vitamin D intakes from 4d-WFR ranged between 0.42 and 31.65 lg day À1 , whereas intakes determined from the FFQ ranged from

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
41
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A validated food frequency questionnaire was used to estimate the habitual dietary intake of vitamin D once a year . The questionnaire comprised of 17 questions pertaining to 13 food groups which contribute to dietary intake of vitamin D, including milk and dairy products, fish, and dietary supplements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A validated food frequency questionnaire was used to estimate the habitual dietary intake of vitamin D once a year . The questionnaire comprised of 17 questions pertaining to 13 food groups which contribute to dietary intake of vitamin D, including milk and dairy products, fish, and dietary supplements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate dietary vitamin D intake, footballers completed a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) [49]. These data were collected on a single occasion due to the negligible contribution of dietary sources to total 25(OH)D concentration and the low intake of such foods in the Western diet [50, 51], despite a growing range of vitamin D-fortified products.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n 49 (35) ). This may lead to an erroneous acceptance of the null hypothesis due to limited power to detect a difference in the traditional hypothesis test (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%