2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Measure of Positive and Negative Affect for use with Cross-national Older Adults

Abstract: IntroductionPositive Affect (PA) and Negative Affect (NA) have been used as general dimensions to describe affective experience, and they are the affective, emotional components of SWB.ObjectivesPositive and negative affect is a relevant facet of well-being for community-dwelling older adults. This study aims to conduct a validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), by assessing the psychometric properties (distributional properties, construct, criterion and external-related validities, and re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, we are not aware of any studies reporting omega values, and we can therefore not judge how our findings compare to previous research. Our results regarding internal consistency are also in line with investigations of the British PANAS in healthy volunteers (alpha of 0.85 for the NA factor and 0.89 for the PA factor) [ 16 ] and the Portuguese PANAS in an elderly, healthy population (alpha of 0.88 for the NA factor and 0.92 for the PA factor) [ 55 ]. We provide summary statistics of the Danish PANAS for individuals with emotional disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Further, we are not aware of any studies reporting omega values, and we can therefore not judge how our findings compare to previous research. Our results regarding internal consistency are also in line with investigations of the British PANAS in healthy volunteers (alpha of 0.85 for the NA factor and 0.89 for the PA factor) [ 16 ] and the Portuguese PANAS in an elderly, healthy population (alpha of 0.88 for the NA factor and 0.92 for the PA factor) [ 55 ]. We provide summary statistics of the Danish PANAS for individuals with emotional disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Os valores de consistência interna da PANAS-14 revelam-se adequados e semelhantes aos das validações prévias com populações diferentes (Carvalho et al, 2013;Cotigă, 2012;Crawford & Henry, 2004;DePaoli & Sweeney, 2000;Dufey & Fernandez, 2012;Galinha & Pais-Ribeiro, 2005;Galinha et al, 2014;Gyollai et al, 2011;Huebner & Dew, 1995;Humboldt & Leal, 2017;Karim et al, 2011;Laurent et al, 1999;Lim et al, 2010;Mackinnon et al, 1999;Sandín et al, 1999;Simões, 1993;Sousa et al, 2016;Thompson, 2007;Watson et al, 1988;Wilson et al, 1998) e aos de validações com pessoas idosas (Buz et al, 2015;Kercher, 1992) que frequentam instituições de apoio social (Costa, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Recent studies suggest that loneliness, which represents the negative subjective experience of the inadequacy of social relationships, is a factor in evolutionary fitness across the life span [47] and is a good indicator of social well-being [48]. Regarding emotional well-being, PA and NA have been used as general dimensions to describe affective, emotional components of subjective well-being [49]. Resilience, as an important indicator of emotional well-being, assesses one's ability to bounce back from or adapt to stressful situations or crises, such as having been diagnosed with ADRD [10,11].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with Cronbach α of .88 for PA and .87 for NA. Furthermore, PANAS has been validated across various cultures and languages worldwide, consistently exhibiting robust psychometric properties in multiple studies [49,56]. Total scores will be calculated for PA and NA, with high scores indicating more PA and NA, respectively.…”
Section: Primary Outcome Measurements For Older Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%