1998
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.134.12.1597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Melanoma Prognostic Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Uncited references Aitken et al, 2010 Ekwueme et al, 2011 Guy and Ekwueme, 2011 Margolis et al, 1998 U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2013 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Uncited references Aitken et al, 2010 Ekwueme et al, 2011 Guy and Ekwueme, 2011 Margolis et al, 1998 U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2013 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melanoma survival rates are inversely related to tumor thickness at diagnosis,5 and physicians are able to detect thinner melanomas than patients or their family members 6, 7. Full-body skin cancer screening is a safe, non-invasive, painless procedure that can be performed by dermatologists as well as primary care physicians 8, 9.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesion thickness (Breslow depth), a reflection of tumor volume, has been identified as one of the most important prognostic factors for primary cutaneous melanoma with survival inversely related to lesion thickness [12,72,94]. In fact, the 5-year relative survival rate for people with melanoma is 91%, and the 10-year survival rate is 87% [3].…”
Section: Secondary Prevention Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%