2019
DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.119.231118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Multifocal Segmentation Method for Measuring Metabolic Tumor Volume in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The images were processed using the software Syngo.via (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). In order to determine the main parameters, i.e., MTV and TLG, we used the special tool multi-foci segmentation (MFS) that automatically registered/delineated contours around each metabolically active focus as the sum of all voxels within VOI after determining the SUV background reference over the liver [ 24 ]. The threshold of FDG uptake was 41% of the SUV maximum inside, as recommended by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images were processed using the software Syngo.via (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). In order to determine the main parameters, i.e., MTV and TLG, we used the special tool multi-foci segmentation (MFS) that automatically registered/delineated contours around each metabolically active focus as the sum of all voxels within VOI after determining the SUV background reference over the liver [ 24 ]. The threshold of FDG uptake was 41% of the SUV maximum inside, as recommended by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among potential biomarkers, metabolic tumour volume seems to be especially promising for clinicians as it represents a measure for the whole-body tumour burden. This principal attractiveness has led to several studies examining metabolic tumour volume and total lesion values for various solid and haematological malignancies, e.g., 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans and their prognostic impact for tumour entities such as cervical cancer [3], head and neck [4,5], pancreatic cancer [6], Hodgkin's lymphoma [7], ovarian [8] and prostate cancer (PCa) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For subjects in group A, having a low tumor burden, all regions of elevated tracer uptake were segmented semi-automatically using 45% of region SUVmax thresholding [ 19 ]. For subjects in group B, which included cases of high tumor burden, all high-uptake sites with SUVmax above the average liver uptake within a PERCIST-based reference region [ 27 ] were segmented with an incremental connected component algorithm [ 28 ] using 45% of SUVmax thresholding, of which up to one hundred sites per subject with the highest SUVmax were annotated. For each subject in group B, at least ten suspicious uptake sites were annotated when present, additionally labeling sites with lower SUVmax if necessary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-task convolutional neural network was trained to both classify PET/CT regions of interest as uptake suspicious or nonsuspicious for cancer and assign them an anatomical location classification. In addition to expert-annotated findings, regions of interest with SUVmax above 1 which were not labeled by the experts as suspicious were generated automatically with an incremental connected component algorithm [ 28 ], labeled as nonsuspicious, and used for training. These were generated using 45% of SUVmax thresholding and only for subjects in group A or subjects in group B with up to nine suspicious findings, i.e., for PET/CT images where all suspicious findings were annotated and remaining image regions could be considered physiological uptake.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation