Validation of a New HPV Self-Sampling Device for Cervical Cancer Screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample in Screening (CASSIS) Study

El‐Zein, Mariam; Bouten, Sheila; Louvanto, Karolina; Gilbert, Lucy; Gotlieb, Walter H.; Hemmings, Robert; Behr, Marcel A.; Franco, Eduardo L.; Liang, Victoria; Martins, Cláudio; Duarte, Silvy; Sarban, Natalia; Geddes, Patricia; Massa, Ana Catarina; Samios, Kathrin; Aboufadl, Siham; Verdon, Sophie; Pereria, Cynthia; Lacroix, Isabelle

doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000000578

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The list of included studies in the 2018 meta-analysis database 5 was updated up to July 4, 2020, with four new publications [6][7][8][9] added. The four new references were independently identified, and relevant data extracted, by two authors (MA and VVS) from 295 records retrieved following the same bibliographic searches and selection criteria as described previously.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta‐analysis of agreement/concordance statistics in studies comparing self‐ vs clinician‐collected samples for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening

Arbyn

Castle

Schiffman

et al. 2022

Intl Journal of Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We conducted a meta-analysis of test agreement/concordance between human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in self-collected vs clinician-collected samples in 26 studies (10 071 participants) updating a previous meta-analysis on accuracy for cervical precancer. Pooled overall agreement was 88.7% (95% CI: 86.3%-90.9%), positive agreement was 84.6% (95% CI: 79.9%-88.7%), negative agreement was 91.7% (95% CI: 89.1%-94.0%) and kappa was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.78). Subgroup meta-analyses suggested higher overall agreement for target amplification-based DNA assays (90.4%) compared to signal amplification-based DNA assays (86.7%; P = .175) or RNA assays (82.3%; P < .001). HPV test agreement/concordance targets may provide criteria to extend existing validations toward alternative sampling approaches and devices/storage media.

show abstract