Validation of a novel effort‐discounting assessment and evaluation of the effort‐delay confound on effort discounting

Abstract

A vast literature highlights the prevalence of impulsive decision making in maladaptive outcomes. Most research has focused on one form—delay discounting. Less research has focused on effort discounting, possibly because of a lack of a standardized task for assessment. In published effort‐discounting tasks, effort is conceptualized in many ways, making it difficult to compare findings across studies. Additionally, most effort‐discounting tasks do not control for the time inherent in completing the effortful task, which makes it difficult to disentangle effort discounting from delay discounting. The current study evaluated the validity of a novel hypothetical effort‐discounting task. The novel task was used to evaluate the influence of the effort‐delay confound on rates of effort discounting in humans. Participants were randomly assigned to complete a confounded or a controlled version of the novel effort‐discounting task. The effort‐discounting data were well described by hyperbolic and exponential functions. When effort and delay were confounded, effort‐discounting rates were significantly higher than when effort alone influenced discounting. The results suggest that data that are produced by effort‐discounting tasks that do not control the effort‐delay confound should be interpreted cautiously because they are also influenced by delay discounting. Task limitations and future directions are discussed.