2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a novel higher-order multi-phase-field model for grain-growth simulations using anisotropic grain-boundary properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Monte Carlo (MD) simulations based on the Potts model 5) are often used to study the grain growth kinetics. [6][7][8][9][10] Moreover, cellular automata (CA), [11][12][13][14] front tracking method, [15][16][17] level-set model, 18) vertex model, 19) surface-evolver model, 20) phasefield model [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] have been widely employed to discuss the grain growth kinetics from the mesoscale point of view. Especially, the multi-phase-field simulation 28,29) is a powerful tool to investigate microstructure evolution since it is not necessary to explicitly track the position of grain boundaries in the polycrystalline microstructure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Monte Carlo (MD) simulations based on the Potts model 5) are often used to study the grain growth kinetics. [6][7][8][9][10] Moreover, cellular automata (CA), [11][12][13][14] front tracking method, [15][16][17] level-set model, 18) vertex model, 19) surface-evolver model, 20) phasefield model [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] have been widely employed to discuss the grain growth kinetics from the mesoscale point of view. Especially, the multi-phase-field simulation 28,29) is a powerful tool to investigate microstructure evolution since it is not necessary to explicitly track the position of grain boundaries in the polycrystalline microstructure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if an error of ~10% is acceptable, the MPF model is considered suitable for modeling grain growth under energy anisotropy within the ratio of the minimum-to-maximum boundary energy of 0.2. Note that the accuracy of the MPF model obtained here is visibly better than that in our previous study; 68) this is because, as described in Section 2.2, the iterative algorithm of Takaki et al 70) was employed in the present MPF simulations, which significantly improves the computational accuracy. In Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Anisotropic Grain Boundary Energymentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Finally, in the same section, we discuss a way to improve the accuracy based on the higher-order modification. [63][64][65][66][67][68]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, phase field models provide outputs in a physical time rather than that of a numerical time as in MC models. In particular, multi-phase field modelling (MPFM) is frequently used as a computational method to simulate the microstructure evolution of metallurgical phenomena, including phase transformation [57,58], recrystallization [59,60] and grain growth [61][62][63]. As a diffuse-interface model, MPFM uses a finite thickness to describe the interfaces, within which the physical properties change continuously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%