2020
DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2020.9002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a portable system for spatial-temporal gait parameters based on a single inertial measurement unit and a mobile application

Abstract: There is a lack of commercially available low-cost technologies to assess gait clinically in non-controlled environments. As a consequence of this, there has been poor massification of motion measurement technologies that are both objective and reliable in nature. Advances about the study of gait and its interpretation in recent years using inertial sensors have allowed proposing acceptable alternatives for the development of portable and low-cost systems that contribute to people’s health in places and instit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may also advance the reproducibility of DFA AP up to an acceptable level. Besides being reliable, highly economical, and practical, IMU signals have frequently been connected to smartphone applications (e.g., Aqueveque et al, 2020 ). Moving forward, such applications could open new possibilities for enabling real-time feedback in self-organization routines such as Newell’s Constraints Led Approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may also advance the reproducibility of DFA AP up to an acceptable level. Besides being reliable, highly economical, and practical, IMU signals have frequently been connected to smartphone applications (e.g., Aqueveque et al, 2020 ). Moving forward, such applications could open new possibilities for enabling real-time feedback in self-organization routines such as Newell’s Constraints Led Approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mobile app incorporates two algorithms developed and validated previously by the research team of this work. The first assess the risk of falls through the segmentation of the instrumented Timed Up & Go test (iTUG) [26], and the second is used for the analysis of gait through the instrumented 10 m walking test (iT10M) [27] (see Figure 4). The mobile app communicates with an application programming interface (API) to manage the database where the user's pre-selected data are stored.…”
Section: Mobile App For Motion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrumentation of this test allows estimating gait parameters with a single sensor located on the lower-back of the patient using a wearable alternative. The algorithm for gait analysis used and validated by the research team [27] allows processing the tri-axial accelerometry signals from the lower back. During the execution of the gait test, these data permit identifying the events of initial contact and final contact of each foot and, in this way, identifying the main gait events.…”
Section: Instrumentation Of the Timed Up And Go Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These technologies were all developmental, apart from the use of Shimmer IMUs(Oubre et al 2020). This indicates a eld of research that is cumulatively gaining interest, however, requires increased complexities of computational predictive modelling to produce joint angle data due The variability of IMU data collection methods and lack of consensus in terms of standard measures, IMU positioning, or approach offers researchers exibility for application however it decreases the ability to compare and utilise shared data and results(Aqueveque et al 2020). Aqueveque provided recommendations for IMU data collection methods for SPT parameters towards the standardisation of IMU data collection methods, however, further pragmatic guidelines using validated methods are required to aid future remote gait assessment where environmental unknowns will complicate data interpretation(Celik et al 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%