2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a SNP-based non-invasive prenatal test to detect the fetal 22q11.2 deletion in maternal plasma samples

Abstract: IntroductionNon-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been widely adopted. Recently, NIPT coverage has expanded to detect subchromosomal abnormalities including the 22q11.2 deletion. Validation of a SNP-based NIPT for detection of 22q11.2 deletions demonstrating a high sensitivity (97.8%) and specificity (99.75%) has been reported. We sought to further demonstrate the performance of a revised version of the test in a larger set of pregnancy plasma samples.Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
63
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Innovations in whole genome sequencing and DNA-based microarrays also make possible an accurate diagnosis of 22q11.2del in the developing fetus using maternal blood sampling (Yatsenko et al, 2015;Schmid et al, 2017). These non-invasive prenatal tests are very sensitive and have low false positive discovery rates (Ravi et al, 2018). Improvements in sequencing limited amounts of fetal DNA from maternal sampling is moving the field to 1 st trimester screening (Srinivasan et al, 2013;Helgeson et al, 2015) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375359).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Innovations in whole genome sequencing and DNA-based microarrays also make possible an accurate diagnosis of 22q11.2del in the developing fetus using maternal blood sampling (Yatsenko et al, 2015;Schmid et al, 2017). These non-invasive prenatal tests are very sensitive and have low false positive discovery rates (Ravi et al, 2018). Improvements in sequencing limited amounts of fetal DNA from maternal sampling is moving the field to 1 st trimester screening (Srinivasan et al, 2013;Helgeson et al, 2015) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375359).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DiGeorge syndrome is first suggested following newborn screens for detecting the levels T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) as a measure of T cell output from the thymus ( Table 1) (Botto et al, 2003;Kobrynski and Sullivan, 2007;Mcdonald-Mcginn et al, 2015). Low TRECs can be an indicator of DiGeorge syndrome, with the diagnosis of 22q11.2del subsequently established by FISH or chromosomal microarray technologies (Kwan et al, 2014;Van Der Spek et al, 2015;Schmid et al, 2017;Ravi et al, 2018). The heterogeneous congenital problems for 22q11.2del patients arise from defective remodeling of the pharyngeal region during embryogenesis (Sullivan, 2004;Bassett et al, 2005;Kobrynski and Sullivan, 2007;Fung et al, 2015;Guna et al, 2015;Mcdonald-Mcginn et al, 2015;Baldini et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was recently piloted for 22q11.2del. Additional efforts based on cell‐free DNA from maternal serum have been developed that utilize single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and multiplex PCR . Further assessment of sensitivity and specificity will be critical as these are offered commercially.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted and genome‐wide cfDNA tests have both been proposed as a screening tests for the detection of panels of microdeletions and microduplications, in particular for 22q11.2DS due to this syndrome's prevalence and clinical importance (Table ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytic validation of test performance has been reported on artificial samples and real plasma samples for three targeted technologies: single nucleotide polymorphisms‐based (SNP‐based), digital analysis of selected regions (DANSR), and targeted capture enrichment assay (TCEA) technologies (Table ) . Results from experiments with artificial samples created by spiking plasma/genomic samples to simulate cfDNA should be considered with caution as these samples may not reflect the analytical performance of real plasma samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%