14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-2929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Time & Frequency Domain Grazing Flow Acoustic Liner Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(10) for the Myers impedance boundary condition and Eq. (27) for the modified impedance boundary condition. For a locally reacting impedance, Eq.…”
Section: Surface Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(10) for the Myers impedance boundary condition and Eq. (27) for the modified impedance boundary condition. For a locally reacting impedance, Eq.…”
Section: Surface Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such situations, it is unclear how well the analytic and numerical solutions should be expected to match, since the analytic solution is only approximate. Similarly, validating numerical simulations against experimental results, as performed by Richter [19] using the NASA Grazing Incidence Tube experimental results [25], has the disadvantage that the mode excited, the definition of the liner impedance and the measured results are all subject to experimental error, and that moreover the results appear sensitive to other factors such as the tube's downstream exit impedance, 3D effects, and viscous and boundary layer effects [26][27][28]. Simple test cases therefore allow an exact comparison between the numerical simulation and an analytic solution, one of the simplest of which is that of an oblique plane wave reflecting from an impedance surface [29]; a number of common validations for 2D and 3D time-dependent numerical acoustics simulations with flow are described by Richter [19, chapter 7.1], and similar validations are also used in 2D and 3D frequency-domain simulations [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for specific liners and under particular flow conditions, some experiments have shown that a convective hydrodynamic instability may grow on the liner and is likely to lead to sound amplification [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Evidence of such instabilities have been shown as well numerically [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 On the contrary, if the boundary-layer is fully resolved, these numerical treatments are unnecessary since the base-flow is zero at the wall. For instance, Richter et al 2 have performed computations on a base-flow obtained by RANS simulation while Burak et al 15 have integrated time domain impedance condition in a Navier-Stokes code.…”
Section: Fully Resolved Boundary-layer or Uniform Flow Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%