Validation of abridged mini-mental state examination scales using population-based data from Sweden and USA

Abstract

The objective of this study is to validate two abridged versions of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE): one intended for use in face-to-face interviews, and the other developed for telephonic interviews, using data from Sweden and the US to validate the abridged scales against dementia diagnoses as well as to compare their performance to that of the full MMSE scale. The abridged versions were based on eight domains from the original MMSE scale. The domains included in the MMSE-SF were registration, orientation, delayed recall, attention, and visual spatial ability. In the MMSE-SF-C, the visual spatial ability item was excluded, and instead, one additional orientation item was added. There were 794 participants from the Swedish HARMONY study [mean age 81.8 (4.8); the proportion of cognitively impaired was 51 %] and 576 participants from the US ADAMS study [mean age 83.2 (5.7); the proportion of cognitively impaired was 65 %] where it was possible to compare abridged MMSE scales to dementia diagnoses and to the full MMSE scale. We estimated the sensitivity and specificity levels of the abridged tests, using clinical diagnoses as reference. Analyses with both the HARMONY and the ADAMS data indicated comparable levels of sensitivity and specificity in detecting cognitive impairment for the two abridged scales relative to the full MMSE. Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the two abridged scales corresponded well to those of the full MMSE. The two abridged tests have adequate validity and correspond well with the full MMSE. The abridged versions could therefore be alternatives to consider in larger population studies where interview length is restricted, and the respondent burden is high.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10433-016-0394-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Do cognitively stimulating activities affect the association between retirement timing and cognitive functioning in old age?

“…This is not surprising, given that our study measured cognitive functioning in an age range during which individuals still tend to score highly on the MMSE test, whereas a rapid decline in cognitive functioning has been shown to start after age 84 (Santoni et al, 2015). Moreover, the low variation in cognitive functioning may have been exacerbated by our use of an abridged version of the MMSE instrument (Ericsson et al, 2017).…”

Pre-diabetes and diabetes are independently associated with adverse cognitive test results: a cross-sectional, population-based study

“…The MMSE is a global cognitive screening test in which orientation, memory, naming ability, ability to follow instructions, attention and copying of pentagons is tested [ 24 ]. It is widely used internationally and has been validated in Swedish populations [ 25 ]. The AQT test [ 26 ], a reliable screening test to detect early dementia [ 27 ], is a test of processing speed, attention and executive function.…”

Developing the Canadian Indigenous Cognitive Assessment for Use With Indigenous Older Anishinaabe Adults in Ontario, Canada

“…This was especially noted in the questions related to orientation, registration, visual naming, and free/cued recall. Notably, these are also the cognitive domains which are some of the more sensitive items in the long-established screening tools ( Coleman et al, 2017 ; Ericsson et al, 2017 ; Horton et al, 2015 ). Beyond the conflicts between Indigenous and Western culture and values, the research findings revealed that issues of cultural safety and systemic racism persist and continue to impact the care of older Anishinaabe adults.…”