2017
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s148890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of algorithms to determine incidence of Hirschsprung disease in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study using health administrative data

Abstract: ObjectiveIncidence rates of Hirschsprung disease (HD) vary by geographical region, yet no recent population-based estimate exists for Canada. The objective of our study was to validate and use health administrative data from Ontario, Canada to describe trends in incidence of HD between 1991 and 2013.Study designTo identify children with HD we tested algorithms consisting of a combination of diagnostic, procedural, and intervention codes against the reference standard of abstracted clinical charts from a tertia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify children born with HD between fiscal years (FY) 1991 to 2013 (April 1, 1991 to March 31, 2014), we used a previously validated algorithm, which relied on the presence of a hospitalization with diagnostic code for HD, plus a surgical or biopsy code for HD-related procedure. This identified patients with HD from within Ontario health administrative data with the following diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity 93.5%, specificity >99.9%, positive predictive value 89.6% and negative predictive value >99.9% ( 10 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify children born with HD between fiscal years (FY) 1991 to 2013 (April 1, 1991 to March 31, 2014), we used a previously validated algorithm, which relied on the presence of a hospitalization with diagnostic code for HD, plus a surgical or biopsy code for HD-related procedure. This identified patients with HD from within Ontario health administrative data with the following diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity 93.5%, specificity >99.9%, positive predictive value 89.6% and negative predictive value >99.9% ( 10 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical case definition algorithm might include/exclude specific diagnostic codes, health encounters, and/or include a specific number of data sources in which diagnoses appear (refer to Table 1 ). Although this approach has proven to be an effective way to monitor disease status (J. Salemi, Rutkowski, Tanner, Matas, & Kirby, 2018 ; Kharbanda et al, 2017 ; Shiff, Oen, Rabbani, & Lix, 2017 ; Nasr, Sullivan, Chan, Wong, & Benchimol, 2017 ), it is important to note that the development of standardized case definition algorithms can be challenging because of jurisdictional differences, differences in disease classification nomenclature, revisions in disease classification coding systems over time (Johnson & Nelson, 2013 ; Shiff et al, 2017 ) and concerns about the validity of diagnostic codes (Farr et al, 2021 ). Also, differences in presentation and severity of CA result in diagnostic variability, which influences ascertainment (Langlois, Sheu, & Scheuerle, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%