“…A typical case definition algorithm might include/exclude specific diagnostic codes, health encounters, and/or include a specific number of data sources in which diagnoses appear (refer to Table 1 ). Although this approach has proven to be an effective way to monitor disease status (J. Salemi, Rutkowski, Tanner, Matas, & Kirby, 2018 ; Kharbanda et al, 2017 ; Shiff, Oen, Rabbani, & Lix, 2017 ; Nasr, Sullivan, Chan, Wong, & Benchimol, 2017 ), it is important to note that the development of standardized case definition algorithms can be challenging because of jurisdictional differences, differences in disease classification nomenclature, revisions in disease classification coding systems over time (Johnson & Nelson, 2013 ; Shiff et al, 2017 ) and concerns about the validity of diagnostic codes (Farr et al, 2021 ). Also, differences in presentation and severity of CA result in diagnostic variability, which influences ascertainment (Langlois, Sheu, & Scheuerle, 2010 ).…”