2007
DOI: 10.1364/ao.46.002091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an 8-14 μm cloud monitor using visual observations of antarctic cloud cover

Abstract: A cloud monitor instrument, sensing 8-14 microm infrared radiation, has been installed near McMurdo, Antarctica, in order to provide supporting cloud cover information for a high-resolution sky-viewing Fabry-Perot spectrometer experiment. Validation of the cloud monitor observations was performed by a 1 year long comparison with the available 6 h visual cloud observations, expressed in octas (obscured eighths of the sky). The agreement between visual observations and those of the cloud monitor is good--the var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are, in many cases, primarily made to support logistical operations in the Antarctic, yet they do have the ability to provide basic information about clouds around the Antarctic. These observations have been utilized directly to understand Antarctic clouds [e.g., Kirchgäßner , 2010] as well as to determine when clouds interfere with other surface‐based observations of the upper atmosphere [e.g., McCarthy et al , 2007; Balsamo et al , 1997].…”
Section: Observational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are, in many cases, primarily made to support logistical operations in the Antarctic, yet they do have the ability to provide basic information about clouds around the Antarctic. These observations have been utilized directly to understand Antarctic clouds [e.g., Kirchgäßner , 2010] as well as to determine when clouds interfere with other surface‐based observations of the upper atmosphere [e.g., McCarthy et al , 2007; Balsamo et al , 1997].…”
Section: Observational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%