2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.810858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma

Abstract: Multiplex immunofluorescence staining enables the simultaneous detection of multiple immune markers in a single tissue section, and is a useful tool for the identification of specific cell populations within the tumour microenvironment. However, this technology has rarely been validated against standard clinical immunohistology, which is a barrier for its integration into clinical practice. This study sought to validate and investigate the accuracy, precision and reproducibility of a multiplex immunofluorescen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that mIF accurately detected the expression of immune cell markers (CD8, CD68, and CD16), immune checkpoint PD-L1, and melanoma marker SOX10, with better accuracy and reproducibility than IHC and single-plex IF. This study demonstrates the potential for the use of mIF in clinical practice 88 .…”
Section: Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The results showed that mIF accurately detected the expression of immune cell markers (CD8, CD68, and CD16), immune checkpoint PD-L1, and melanoma marker SOX10, with better accuracy and reproducibility than IHC and single-plex IF. This study demonstrates the potential for the use of mIF in clinical practice 88 .…”
Section: Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Furthermore, in contrast to IF multiplex IHC, the development of assays involving BF multiple IHC chromogenic substrates presents some critical issues such as the visual contrast compatibility of chromogens and cellular localization of combined markers. IF multiplex IHC is undoubtedly a very powerful tool that allows a more complete and more in-depth characterization of the TME than the BF multiplex IHC [ 19 , 21 , 29 ]. IF multiplex IHC permits colocalizing more markers on the same cells than is technically impossible with BF multiplex IHC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IF multiplex IHC permits colocalizing more markers on the same cells than is technically impossible with BF multiplex IHC. In addition, the large number of dyes available and the possibility of “turning them on” and “turning them off” coupled with automated rapid imaging system LED technologies [ 23 ] make the IF multiplex IHC the leading staining technique in the research field [ 25 , 29 ]. For all these reasons, BF multiplex IHC has remained less widespread than IF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Slides were airdried overnight, then placed in a vacuum sealed dehydrator for short-term storage. mIHC panels were optimized as according to Yaseen et al (27).…”
Section: Multiplex Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%