2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04460.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an automated latex particle–enhanced immunoturbidimetric von Willebrand factor activity assay

Abstract: To cite this article: Chen D, Tange JI, Meyers BJ, Pruthi RK, Nichols WL, Heit JA. Validation of an automated latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric von Willebrand factor activity assay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These assays do not, however, have a systematic bias and it is unlikely that vWF assay differences alone account for our results. 29 Finally, the absence of clinical cardiovascular disease in this cohort led to relatively small effect estimates. However, the difference in RV mass from the uppermost to lowermost quintiles of vWF was 3.8%, greater than the 2.8% increase in LV mass seen with diabetes in MESA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These assays do not, however, have a systematic bias and it is unlikely that vWF assay differences alone account for our results. 29 Finally, the absence of clinical cardiovascular disease in this cohort led to relatively small effect estimates. However, the difference in RV mass from the uppermost to lowermost quintiles of vWF was 3.8%, greater than the 2.8% increase in LV mass seen with diabetes in MESA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This finding again confirms the previous observation. 12 As an acute reactant, the elevated vWF could be related to the severity of the patient's underlying chronic disease; however, it is hard to explain why a higher vWF antigen-and collagen-binding activity is more associated with bleeding risk.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assays based on monoclonal antibodies directed against the VWF GPIb-binding site, sometimes called ‘VWF activity assays’ have previously failed to detect type 2 VWD (Preston 1998) and although more recent versions have improved precision and sensitivity, they are not yet sufficiently reliable to replace VWF:RCo (Chen, et al 2011, Favaloro, et al 2012). Pending further data we recommend they are not relied on for diagnosis.…”
Section: Tests Used For the Primary Diagnosis Of Vwdmentioning
confidence: 99%