2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08385-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an automatic tool for the rapid measurement of brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensity: QyScore®

Abstract: Objectives QyScore® is an imaging analysis tool certified in Europe (CE marked) and the US (FDA cleared) for the automatic volumetry of grey and white matter (GM and WM respectively), hippocampus (HP), amygdala (AM), and white matter hyperintensity (WMH). Here we compare QyScore® performances with the consensus of expert neuroradiologists. Methods Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the relative volume difference (RVD) for GM, WM volumes were calculated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… volume of lesions 1st, 2nd ( Yildirim and Dandil, 2021a ) 38 MS T2-w mask R-CNN with ResNet101 as backbone / DSC, volume overlap error, LTPR, LFPR 1st, 2nd ( Tran et al, 2022 ) 30 MS T1-w and FLAIR intensity-based b.c. WM hyperintensities volume agreement, DSC, FPR, TPR, F1 score 1st, 2nd, 3rd ( Cavedo et al, 2022 ) 130 images multi-centric, different populations FLAIR intensity-based / WM hyperintensities volume, DSC, relative VD, absolute volume error 1st, 2nd, 3rd ( Brune et al, 2020 ) 56 MS MPRAGE and FLAIR intensity-based / lesion count of tool vs neuroradiologists, single and multiple timepoints 1st, 2nd, 3rd ( Jain et al, 2017 ) 22 MS T1-w and FLAIR maximum a posteriori model on image intensities of both time points b.c., normalisation DSC, F1, LTPR, LFPR, AVD 1st, 2nd ( Van Hecke et al, 2021 ) batches of 10 and 25 MS, plus 87 subjects with CIS and MS T1-w and FLAIR U-Net with attention gate layers MNI reg., skull stripping, z-score normalisation with vs without tool performances, surveys on patient’s perspective 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th ( Sousa et al, 2021 ) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… volume of lesions 1st, 2nd ( Yildirim and Dandil, 2021a ) 38 MS T2-w mask R-CNN with ResNet101 as backbone / DSC, volume overlap error, LTPR, LFPR 1st, 2nd ( Tran et al, 2022 ) 30 MS T1-w and FLAIR intensity-based b.c. WM hyperintensities volume agreement, DSC, FPR, TPR, F1 score 1st, 2nd, 3rd ( Cavedo et al, 2022 ) 130 images multi-centric, different populations FLAIR intensity-based / WM hyperintensities volume, DSC, relative VD, absolute volume error 1st, 2nd, 3rd ( Brune et al, 2020 ) 56 MS MPRAGE and FLAIR intensity-based / lesion count of tool vs neuroradiologists, single and multiple timepoints 1st, 2nd, 3rd ( Jain et al, 2017 ) 22 MS T1-w and FLAIR maximum a posteriori model on image intensities of both time points b.c., normalisation DSC, F1, LTPR, LFPR, AVD 1st, 2nd ( Van Hecke et al, 2021 ) batches of 10 and 25 MS, plus 87 subjects with CIS and MS T1-w and FLAIR U-Net with attention gate layers MNI reg., skull stripping, z-score normalisation with vs without tool performances, surveys on patient’s perspective 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th ( Sousa et al, 2021 ) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical: Qynapse has compared the current method for lesion segmentation to a previous method, to state-of-theart lesion segmentation methods (including LST, Lesion-TOADS, lesionBrain, BIANCA, and nicMSlesions), and to manual segmentation [25,30]. QyScore has been tested for robustness to different input data [30].…”
Section: Qynapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools aim to improve the objectivity of image interpretation by increasing the sensitivity of MRI analysis [18,19], the accuracy [20][21][22][23][24][25] and reproducibility of results [22,26], and potentially decreasing reporting time [18]. QReports can facilitate cross-sectional diagnosis [20,[26][27][28][29][30], longitudinal assessment [20,22,23,31], and therapy response monitoring [32] via user-friendly graphical displays. QReports may also offer automatic contextualization of an individual patient's volumetric results against a relevant reference population [33], which could assist clinicians in disease course prognostication and deciding on therapeutic strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are used in a number of popular software tools, such as VolBrain 6 , Qyscore 7 , Neuroquant 8 , or IcoBrain DM 9 . One potential limitation with these approaches is the use of civil age and sex as co-variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%