“… volume of lesions | 1st, 2nd | | ( Yildirim and Dandil, 2021a ) | 38 MS | T2-w | mask R-CNN with ResNet101 as backbone | / | DSC, volume overlap error, LTPR, LFPR | 1st, 2nd | |
( Tran et al, 2022 ) | 30 MS | T1-w and FLAIR | intensity-based | b.c. | WM hyperintensities volume agreement, DSC, FPR, TPR, F1 score | 1st, 2nd, 3rd | |
( Cavedo et al, 2022 ) | 130 images multi-centric, different populations | FLAIR | intensity-based | / | WM hyperintensities volume, DSC, relative VD, absolute volume error | 1st, 2nd, 3rd | |
( Brune et al, 2020 ) | 56 MS | MPRAGE and FLAIR | intensity-based | / | lesion count of tool vs neuroradiologists, single and multiple timepoints | 1st, 2nd, 3rd | |
( Jain et al, 2017 ) | 22 MS | T1-w and FLAIR | maximum a posteriori model on image intensities of both time points | b.c., normalisation | DSC, F1, LTPR, LFPR, AVD | 1st, 2nd | |
( Van Hecke et al, 2021 ) | batches of 10 and 25 MS, plus 87 subjects with CIS and MS | T1-w and FLAIR | U-Net with attention gate layers | MNI reg., skull stripping, z-score normalisation | with vs without tool performances, surveys on patient’s perspective | 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th | |
( Sousa et al, 2021 ) | |
…”