2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05448-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an e-health readiness assessment framework for developing countries

Abstract: Background: Studies document e-health as having potential to improve quality of healthcare services, resulting in both developed and developing countries demonstrating continued interest in e-health uptake and use. e-Health implementations are not always successful as high failure rates have been reported in both developed and developing countries. These failures are often a result of lack of e-health readiness. e-Health readiness has been defined as the preparedness of healthcare institutions or communities f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent history of eHealth implementation and experimentation in many LRCs has resulted in research and publication of many relevant results, including those that touched on sustainable implementation of eHealth in these countries [ 3 , 7 , 17 , 18 , 30 , 31 ]. In addition, Mauco et al [ 32 ] developed and validated an eHealth readiness assessment framework for developing countries. It includes a comprehensive set of readiness factors, including organizational, technological or infrastructural, government, societal, health care provider, engagement, core, and public- or patient-related.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recent history of eHealth implementation and experimentation in many LRCs has resulted in research and publication of many relevant results, including those that touched on sustainable implementation of eHealth in these countries [ 3 , 7 , 17 , 18 , 30 , 31 ]. In addition, Mauco et al [ 32 ] developed and validated an eHealth readiness assessment framework for developing countries. It includes a comprehensive set of readiness factors, including organizational, technological or infrastructural, government, societal, health care provider, engagement, core, and public- or patient-related.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether hospitals implement experimental or full eHealth applications, their operations are a source of data and user opinions that could be harvested to deduce predictions and possible causes of success or failure in future installations. The problem is that almost all related research on LRCs has been based on single installations or systematic reviews [ 3 , 7 , 22 , 23 , 32 ], and it is difficult to generalize from these to validate a theoretical framework. We note that there are organizations that publish hospital rankings in different regions and countries, including most, if not all, LRCs (eg, Ranking Web of Hospitals [ 33 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readiness or organizational readiness can be defined as “the extent to which organizational members are psychologically and behaviorally prepared to implement organizational change” [ 13 ]. The concept of organizational readiness is an integral component of implementing new health programs owing to the growing recognition that programs may fail not as a result of the digital health innovation but because organizational readiness for change is not adequately evaluated and addressed [ 14 , 15 ]. The assessment of organizational readiness is therefore advised in the early phases of implementation in order to gain a better understanding of the challenges and facilitators for successful implementation, augmentation, and optimization of implementation strategies [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technological readiness is often called, e-readiness. 13 We found that the blended methodology model was ideally suited to the trainees and efficiently increased their knowledge and significantly improved ICP-related practices. We expanded access to the course in multiple regions of the world and offered the course as a yearly training event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%