2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an effervescent spray model with secondary atomization and its application to modeling of a large-scale furnace

Abstract: The present work consists of a validation attempt of an effervescent spray model with secondary atomization.The objective is the simulation of a 1 MW industrial-type liquid fuel burner equipped with effervescent spray nozzle. The adopted approach is based on a double experimental validation. Firstly, the evolution of radial drop size distributions of an isothermal spray is investigated. Secondly, the spray model is tested in a swirling combustion simulation by means of measured wall heat flux profile along the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…/?s "C 1 is calculated according to Rs.nel = Rs.gen Rs.ox The rate of soot formation was based on a simple empirical rate [17] Rs.gen = CS/ V e ERT (9) where Cs and /• are constants, Pr is the fuel partial pressure, and <p is the fuel equivalence ratio. /?s "C 1 is calculated according to Rs.nel = Rs.gen Rs.ox The rate of soot formation was based on a simple empirical rate [17] Rs.gen = CS/ V e ERT (9) where Cs and /• are constants, Pr is the fuel partial pressure, and <p is the fuel equivalence ratio.…”
Section: ( P Y S) + V (P?ys) = V -(^V R S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…/?s "C 1 is calculated according to Rs.nel = Rs.gen Rs.ox The rate of soot formation was based on a simple empirical rate [17] Rs.gen = CS/ V e ERT (9) where Cs and /• are constants, Pr is the fuel partial pressure, and <p is the fuel equivalence ratio. /?s "C 1 is calculated according to Rs.nel = Rs.gen Rs.ox The rate of soot formation was based on a simple empirical rate [17] Rs.gen = CS/ V e ERT (9) where Cs and /• are constants, Pr is the fuel partial pressure, and <p is the fuel equivalence ratio.…”
Section: ( P Y S) + V (P?ys) = V -(^V R S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aspects provide a method of instant vaporization and mixing of liquid fuels with oxidizer that significantly affects the combustion rate. Many [8][9][10][11] modeling efforts of liquid atomization and spray combustion have been attempted during the past few years and satisfactory level of agreement between the experimental data and numerical simulations in flame structure and soot predictions are successfully obtained. Many [8][9][10][11] modeling efforts of liquid atomization and spray combustion have been attempted during the past few years and satisfactory level of agreement between the experimental data and numerical simulations in flame structure and soot predictions are successfully obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From experimental studies using optical characterization techniques [2][3][4][5][6] and spray droplet size distribution predictions from modeling [7,8]. Most of the research performed on these types of atomizers is regarding two phase liquid/gas mixtures under unconfined atmospheric conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flowing of pressure is regulated by the pressure regulator (4) manually. The amount of pressure can be seen in the pressure gauge (3). If the pressure is excess of adjusted pressure, then the excess flow will return to the tank (1), while the pressure that has been set will flow to the injector.…”
Section: B Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in the worldwide development of transportation, providing high performance of aircrafts and diesel engines [1]. Oil-fired furnaces also employ spray combustion [3]. While the energy is a key condition for the survival of the human race, there is an ethics that should not be ruled out in the effort to meet the energy needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%