2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an Operational Definition to Identify Distal Radius Fractures in a National Health Insurance Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 22 23 24 Validation studies are the best method to confirm the proposed algorithm of diagnostic codes. 24 According to our recent study, the sensitivity was 62.5% and the positive predictive value of operational definition was 59.7%, which was lower than that of hip 35 or wrist fractures, 36 but higher than that of other VFs. 37 To diagnose VFs as accurately as possible, we used a one-year lag time period after being diagnosed as underweight and excluded patients with previous VFs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“… 22 23 24 Validation studies are the best method to confirm the proposed algorithm of diagnostic codes. 24 According to our recent study, the sensitivity was 62.5% and the positive predictive value of operational definition was 59.7%, which was lower than that of hip 35 or wrist fractures, 36 but higher than that of other VFs. 37 To diagnose VFs as accurately as possible, we used a one-year lag time period after being diagnosed as underweight and excluded patients with previous VFs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Secondary, or subordinated, diagnostic codes imply the use of fewer medical resources than those needed for primary diagnoses. For this reason, the order of diagnostic codes is often used as a criterion for developing operational definitions using claims data, 39 40 and classifying the codes as primary or secondary. Additionally, imaging and procedure codes were used along with diagnostic codes to increase the accuracy of the operational definitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various operational definitions have been proposed for the identification of patients with osteoporotic fractures including VF, hip fracture and distal radius fracture. 35 40 41 Unlike other osteoporotic fractures, 40 41 identification of patients with osteoporosis-related VFs in claims data is challenging because the claims database does not include data on injury mechanism or bone mineral density. Moreover, the patient’s condition often improves with simple conservative treatments, such as prescription pain relievers, precluding the need for specialty treatments such as vertebroplasty or fusion surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to verify the validity of the hip fracture diagnoses. Nevertheless, in the latest study that evaluated the validity of the operational definition for distal radius fractures using the Korean National Health Insurance data, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the definition with all diagnosis codes were similar to those of the definition with primary and secondary codes [ 49 ]. Specifically, compared with the definition without procedure codes, the operational definition with all diagnosis and procedure codes showed lower sensitivity, higher specificity, and higher PPV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%