2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of borehole heat exchanger models against multi-flow rate thermal response tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of experimental measurements presented by Beier et al (2018) to a conventional borehole model using the simple mean fluid temperature approximation gives quite good results over a wide range of flow rates as long as the thermal short-circuiting is accounted for. That is, to obtain good accuracy, the effective borehole thermal resistance ( * ) should be used as shown in Figure 14 of Beier et al (2018) rather than the local borehole thermal resistance ( ). When the local borehole thermal resistance is used with the simple mean fluid temperature approximation (labeled "1D model with f = 0.5"" in Figures 9 and 11 of Beier et al (2018)) errors exceed 1°C at Reynolds numbers below about 6,500.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A comparison of experimental measurements presented by Beier et al (2018) to a conventional borehole model using the simple mean fluid temperature approximation gives quite good results over a wide range of flow rates as long as the thermal short-circuiting is accounted for. That is, to obtain good accuracy, the effective borehole thermal resistance ( * ) should be used as shown in Figure 14 of Beier et al (2018) rather than the local borehole thermal resistance ( ). When the local borehole thermal resistance is used with the simple mean fluid temperature approximation (labeled "1D model with f = 0.5"" in Figures 9 and 11 of Beier et al (2018)) errors exceed 1°C at Reynolds numbers below about 6,500.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(3.6) Equation 3.5 assumes that the simple mean fluid temperature is an adequate approximation to the true mean fluid temperature. More sophisticated models are available (Rees 2015, Beier et al 2018, but this sophistication is mainly important at short times, below an hour, when transit time effects are predominant. A comparison of experimental measurements presented by Beier et al (2018) to a conventional borehole model using the simple mean fluid temperature approximation gives quite good results over a wide range of flow rates as long as the thermal short-circuiting is accounted for.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies have focused on a better understanding and more precise estimation of effective thermal conductivity and borehole thermal resistance [1][2][3][4] as important parameters when exploiting the shallow geothermal resource. Current methods of determining the average fluid temperature within BHE, as well as the influence of various measuring methods during TRT, on the final determination of thermal properties are also available [5][6][7]. With newly established data interpretation of time derivative of fluid temperature, measured during the first few hours of TRT operation, it was shown that the duration of the test could be shortened significantly, while the values of effective thermal conductivity can still be estimated within the 10% margin of error [8].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beier et al [7] studied a borehole heat transfer model that uses a transient weighting factor to calculate the average circulating fluid temperature along the borehole has been applied to analyse multi-flow rate thermal response tests (MFR-TRT) The model accounts for short-circuiting by an analytically computed weighting factor that is used to determine the mean fluid temperature. It was stated that both; the effective borehole thermal resistance model and the weighting factor give quite good results a few hours after a step change in flow rate, the weighting factor model gives much better results in the first few hours after a step change in flow rate.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%