2008
DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e3282fe1d28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of brachial artery pressure reconstruction from finger arterial pressure

Abstract: Reconstruction of intrabrachial artery pressure from finger artery pressure with waveform filtering and level correction reduces the pressure differences substantially, with diastolic and mean within Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation requirements. After one supine return-to-flow calibration, all pressure differences meet the requirements. Return-to-flow calibration should not be repeated in sitting position.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
105
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood flow and reactive hyperaemia Forearm blood flow (FBF) and forearm RH 25 were measured using a mercury-in-silastic strain gauge plethysmograph (EC-6; DE Hokanson Inc., Issaquah, WA, USA) as described by Higashi et al 18 Briefly, the subject was positioned in the supine position with their arm elevated slightly above heart level. Following a circumference measurement of the lower left arm, a strain gauge was attached and connected to the plethysmograph.…”
Section: Haemodynamic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood flow and reactive hyperaemia Forearm blood flow (FBF) and forearm RH 25 were measured using a mercury-in-silastic strain gauge plethysmograph (EC-6; DE Hokanson Inc., Issaquah, WA, USA) as described by Higashi et al 18 Briefly, the subject was positioned in the supine position with their arm elevated slightly above heart level. Following a circumference measurement of the lower left arm, a strain gauge was attached and connected to the plethysmograph.…”
Section: Haemodynamic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If o75% of the ABPM recordings for a particular participant were successful, the measurements were repeated the next day. The validated [18][19][20][21] Finometer device (FMS, Finapres Measurement Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was connected, and a 5-min continuous measurement of resting cardiovascular parameters was carried out. During the recording, after 2 min, a return-to-flow systolic calibration was performed to provide an individual subject-level adjustment of the finger arterial pressure with the brachial artery pressure.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the recording, after 2 min, a return-to-flow systolic calibration was performed to provide an individual subject-level adjustment of the finger arterial pressure with the brachial artery pressure. 19 Therefore, highest precision in cardiovascular measurements is obtainable only after this calibration, 19 and blood pressure levels meet the requirements of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. 22 The Finometer computed the stroke volume, cardiac output and total peripheral resistance online and stored the data in result files.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, the same observer monitored BP continuously by making use of the Finometer device (FMS, Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands). 21,22 This entailed a 5-min recording of each participant's BP under resting, yet awake, conditions. After the first 2 min, the finger pressure was calibrated with the upper arm (brachial) pressure (that is, returnto-flow systolic calibration).…”
Section: Blood Pressure Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%