2018
DOI: 10.1080/02726351.2018.1435594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of CFD model of multiphase flow through pipeline and annular geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[53] Applications of CFD in the simulation of multiphase flow systems in different processes have grown considerably in recent years. [20][21][22][23][24] Most of the published studies used two-dimensional simulation models due to memory usage and processor speed issues. [54,55] Zhang et al's model was employed to simulate three-dimensional homogeneous fluidization of Geldart type A particles.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[53] Applications of CFD in the simulation of multiphase flow systems in different processes have grown considerably in recent years. [20][21][22][23][24] Most of the published studies used two-dimensional simulation models due to memory usage and processor speed issues. [54,55] Zhang et al's model was employed to simulate three-dimensional homogeneous fluidization of Geldart type A particles.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22,23] CFD studies are normally used to further understand gas and solid complex behaviours in multiphase systems. [24][25][26][27][28] Both the Eulerian-Eulerian (EE) and Eulerian-Lagrangian (EL) approaches are mostly employed for the simulation of multiphase flow in fluidized beds. [2] The EL approach is a discrete element method (DEM) based on the molecular dynamics approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the applications of the KTGF model for simulations of slurry pipeline flow have been interpretative rather than predictive, as shown in Figure 18. Many of these interpretative studies (e.g., see Chen et al [132], Kaushal et al [67], Gopaliya et al [145,146], Zhang et al [75], Sultan et al [147], Li et al [148]) make comparisons between predicted and experimental macroscopic variables such a pressure drop and concentration gradient while others, like the study of Hashemi et al [134], use simulations to study difficult-to-measure variables, such as velocity fluctuations or turbulence attenuation. It is speculated that the preponderance of interpretive studies is inversely related to the attention paid to rigorous verification and validation (V&V) techniques.…”
Section: Verification and Validation Of Eulerian Ktgf Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although large eddy simulation and direct numeric simulation can accurately reproduce the turbulent flow field structure, for practical engineering problems, the huge amount of calculations makes it difficult to use these two methods generally. Therefore, in practical engineering, the use of turbulence model to deal with the problem is currently commonly used research methods [23]. In engineering problems, commonly used turbulence models mainly include: Standard k − ε model, RNG k − ε model and Realizable k − ε model.…”
Section: Selection Of Turbulence Model For Horizontal Slurry Migratiomentioning
confidence: 99%