1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-9441(98)90004-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of continuous thermodilution cardiac output in critically i11 patients with analysis of systematic errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CPATD CO measurements have been shown to correlate well with IB-PATD CO measurements under a wide range of CO in patients [62][63][64][65][66][67][68] (Table 1) and in animal models. 69,70 CPATD CO measurements were also compared with electromagnetometry and ultrasound using aortic flowprobes, representing most closely a "gold standard" for continuous determination of CO, in cardiac surgery patients, as well as in the presence of an LV assist device, allowing predetermination of aortic blood flow.…”
Section: Sources Of Measurement Error and Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…CPATD CO measurements have been shown to correlate well with IB-PATD CO measurements under a wide range of CO in patients [62][63][64][65][66][67][68] (Table 1) and in animal models. 69,70 CPATD CO measurements were also compared with electromagnetometry and ultrasound using aortic flowprobes, representing most closely a "gold standard" for continuous determination of CO, in cardiac surgery patients, as well as in the presence of an LV assist device, allowing predetermination of aortic blood flow.…”
Section: Sources Of Measurement Error and Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Dans cette optique, les versions du cathéter de Swan Ganz (PAC-CCO) permettent la mesure intermittente du DC par thermodilution bolus couplée à un monitorage continu avec deux périodes d'échantillonnages possibles : la première rafraîchie toutes les minutes (STAT) avec un temps de réponse assez bref (quelques minutes) mais une précision médiocre, l'autre avec un moyennage sur plus de cinq minutes résultant en un temps de réponse lent (10-15 min) et une précision plus grande [13][14][15]. Cette technologie est loin d'être parfaite mais reste à ce jour la plus utilisée [1,[16][17][18] dans la mesure ou le biais moyen a été trouvé assez faible pour être acceptable dans une grande variété de situations cliniques et sur une large plage de mesure [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. De plus en plus d'études laissent présager que les solutions moins invasives qui font toutes appel à des technologies intrinsèquement plus précises et plus réactives atteindront bientôt un niveau d'exactitude suffisant pour satisfaire à tous les critères de qualité recommandés ici [12,[26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Choix De La Population De Patients à éTudierunclassified
“…Moreover, the PCWP method is not easy to implement, as exemplified by the frequent occurrence of partial wedging and balloon overinflation (59,74). Similarly, proper implementation of the thermodilution method is hindered by variations in injectate volume, rate, and temperature, which introduce 10 -15% error in the measurement (26,48,72,103). Perhaps due in part to these limitations along with the moderate level of invasiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter, this longstanding ICU device has yet to reveal a clinical benefit (see, e.g., Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%