2015
DOI: 10.3955/046.089.0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Daily Increment Formation in Otoliths from Spring Chinook Salmon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subsample of ten otoliths were reevaluated three times in a blind precision study, with a final precision rate of over 90% for all averaged measurements (> 95% for most). When counting daily growth rings, we assumed that visual otolith increments approximated daily growth and counted a minimum of seven daily rings to account for natural variability (Chittaro et al 2015). We avoided using the width of outermost increments in our growth measurements, as these may still have been forming at capture and are prone to damage during preparation (Campana 2001).…”
Section: Otolith Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subsample of ten otoliths were reevaluated three times in a blind precision study, with a final precision rate of over 90% for all averaged measurements (> 95% for most). When counting daily growth rings, we assumed that visual otolith increments approximated daily growth and counted a minimum of seven daily rings to account for natural variability (Chittaro et al 2015). We avoided using the width of outermost increments in our growth measurements, as these may still have been forming at capture and are prone to damage during preparation (Campana 2001).…”
Section: Otolith Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Back-calculation of fish length at a previous age is estimated by aging a hard structure and measuring its radius to a specific growth increment or annulus (Baumann et al 2013). Most fish species deposit regular increments on hard structures (Fisher and Pearcy 1990;Chittaro et al 2015), and increment-deposition frequency may be daily (i.e., otoliths; Bradford and Geen 1992;Bestgen and Bundy 1998) or related to growth rate (i.e., scales; Beamish et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There will also be a role for other methods in future sampling, including estimates of growth from otolith and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) measurements. For example, there is some preliminary but suggestive evidence that Portland Harbor west bank migrants have a modified growth rate relative to east bank fish [data unpublished, methods from [ 68 ]].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%