2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6ay02542k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of density separation for the rapid recovery of microplastics from sediment

Abstract: Validation of the separation of secondary microplastics from sediment using numerous brine solutions in a rapid, reproducible, single stage technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
164
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
164
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Once samples are collected, separation of the plastic fraction from the non-plastic fraction is needed. These methods use the differences between plastics and materials common in the environment to separate microplastic from aqueous, sedimentary, or mixed samples [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Sampling Of Microplastic Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once samples are collected, separation of the plastic fraction from the non-plastic fraction is needed. These methods use the differences between plastics and materials common in the environment to separate microplastic from aqueous, sedimentary, or mixed samples [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Sampling Of Microplastic Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium iodide (NaI) solution was prepared by dissolving the salt in distilled water to achieve a final density of 1.6 g cm -3 . We used NaI solution in this study because it is less environmentally dangerous compared to other commonly used salt solutions such as ZnBr 2 (Quinn, Murphy & Ewins, 2017). The solution was filtered through glass fiber filters (Whatman GF/F) prior to use in order to remove any contaminants.…”
Section: Microplastic Separation From Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.6 g cm -3 ) and plastics (0.1-1.7 g cm -3 ) (Chubarenko et al, 2016). In density separation, dense solutions that have been proposed include sodium polytungstate (density: ~3.2 g cm -3 ), zinc chloride (ZnCl 2 , density: ~1.8 g cm -3 ), zinc bromide (ZnBr 2 , density: 1.7 g cm -3 ) and sodium iodide (NaI, density: ~1.8 g cm -3 ) (Corcoran, Biesinger & Grifi, 2009;Imhof et al, 2012;Liebezeit & Dubaish, 2012;Dekiff et al, 2014;Van Cauwenberghe et al, 2015b;Quinn, Murphy & Ewins, 2017;Prata et al, 2018). Due to the higher densities of these salt solutions compared to most microplastics (0.9-1.5 g cm -3 ), less dense microplastics float and separate out from the more dense, sinking, sediment materials (Quinn, Murphy & Ewins, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this list, the authors recommended the use of ZnBr 2 (Miller et al 2017). Nevertheless, ZnBr 2 has to date just been used by one study (Quinn et al 2017) and ZnCl 2 is not included in the list although it is suitable for the same density range, less expensive (ZnBr 2 : 165 € kg −1 , ZnCl 2 : 92.50 € kg −1 , Merck Millipore, December 2017) and more widely used. Therefore, other authors have recommended the use of ZnCl 2 as well (Löder and Gerdts 2015;Ivleva et al 2016;Primpke et al 2017a).…”
Section: Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%